Denial and obfuscation switch scam junk

https://evolutionnews.org/
There doesn't seem to be any ID science worth discussing at the creationist news site.  Denial of the existing science is about all that seems to be left.
There is one bogus design claim about molecular animations, and that seems to be it for the design inference.  The Sternberg immaterial junk and claims of being Platonic seem to be just obfuscation and attempted denial of the reality that life has evolved on this planet for billions of years.  Denton and Behe have acknowledged the reality of life evolving for billions of years on this planet, but they have never been taken seriously by the other ID perps that are still into evolution denial.
This is pretty much all that they can do in order to keep using ID as bait to scam the creationist rubes.
Behe has been about the only ID perp trying to think up anything to keep the ID scam going.  His attempt to salvage IC with his 3 neutral mutations and his waiting time argument failed because the only examples that he could find did not exceed his limit and had to be acknowledged to have been something that evolution by natural means could accomplish.   He tried to keep the stupidity alive by claiming that what could be found was on the "edge" of evolution (what was possible) as if that meant anything when he couldn't find his 3 neutral mutations ever existing in nature.  He made the laughable "devolution" argument where he had to admit that whale evolution would have been expected to have happened by natural mechanisms, but that it was a bad type of evolution, and that his designer would have done it a better way.  Tragically stupid as an attempt to support the ID scam.  Meyer has put out his book The God Hypothesis, but he failed to produce a coherent hypothesis.  He had the Top Six god-of-the-gaps denial stupidity in the book, but he only used them as unconnected gap denial, and did not try to build some type of single god hypothesis out of them.  The god that fills the IDiotic Top Six gaps is not the god described in the Bible.
None of the IDiots seem to want to admit that the creationist ID scam seems to be as dead as Johnson, Wells and Bechly.  None of them seems to want to admit that the Big Tent was always a lie even though nothing that they ever came up with would have supported the Biblical views of the majority of IDiotic creationists (most of them are still YEC even though most of the ID perps are OEC).
There still isn't any evidence that the ID scam has any type of viable future even among the creationist rubes that are still taken in by the bait and switch scam.  What is Sternberg's "immaterial universe" going to do for the YEC, when it obviously has been going on for billions of years of cellular replication?
Since uncommon descent died and the IDiotic creationists on TO abandoned the ID scam is there any evidence that there are any credible people supporting the current ID bait and switch scam?  There are obviously a lot of dishonest ID perps willing to keep using ID as bait, but are there any serious Biblical creationists that support any possible ID science or are they all just happy to keep using ID as bait to make the rubes bend over for their obfuscation and denial switch scam that they claim has nothing to do with ID nor creationism.  Creationists like Tour admit that the ID science doesn't exist, and are only interested in the gap denial.
Most of the IDiots on TO quit the ID scam because they never wanted any ID science to be accomplished.  Any viable ID science, with respect to the Top Six gap denial arguments, would have just been more science to deny.  If Tour is ever successful in demonstrating that some god created life on this planet billions of years ago it would just be more science to deny for the majority of YEC IDiots.
Ron Okimoto