Re: Did Dawkins really claim that god-did-it is a scientific hypothesis?

On 5/29/25 7:54 PM, RonO wrote:
Only a fraud gives a shit about Darwin. He was a plagiarist, and
not a good one. And he did not -- Repeat: NOT! -- "believe in
evolution."
You know, though you refuse to grasp, that the communist world
banned evolution! They rejected it. And in it's place was
something so close to Darwin's one & only theory (Pangenesis)
that you can't even tell them apart. Which makes sense, and
not just because you're a goddamn fraud but, because they were
both plagiarized from Lamarck!
THAT is what Darwin believed in!  Yes he did eventually use the
word "Evolution" and if you're on the Autism spectrum you can
never move past that but, he did not mean what we normals mean
when we say "Evolution" today. No, he meant what the later
communist world meant when they outlawed evolution!  He meant
pseudo scientific rubbish:  Pangenesis.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5