Sujet : Re: Is Belief in God Rational? A Fresh Look at the Evidence
De : wthyde1953 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (William Hyde)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 02. Jun 2025, 22:55:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101l6k5$3hnqq$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
IDentity wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 13:03:32 +0100, David <David@invalid.invald> wrote:
Hello.
>
I'd very much welcome reader's views on this recent article:-
>
https://aish.com/is-belief-in-god-rational-a-fresh-look-at-the-evidence
>
//What if belief in God isn’t blind faith—but a logical conclusion drawn
from cutting-edge science and ancient wisdom?//
"The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into
an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you."
This is not found in any of Heisenberg's writings, and people who knew him says it does not sound typical of him.
He did say:
“In the history of science, ever since the famous trial of Galileo, it has repeatedly been claimed that scientific truth cannot be reconciled with the religious interpretation of the world. Although I am now convinced that scientific truth is unassailable in its own field, I have never found it possible to dismiss the content of religious thinking as simply part of an outmoded phase in the consciousness of mankind, a part we shall have to give up from now on. Thus in the course of my life I have repeatedly been compelled to ponder on the relationship of these two regions of thought, for I have never been able to doubt the reality of that to which they point.” From “Scientific and Religious Truth” (1974)."
Note that bit at the end. That's how you can tell lies like yours from the truth. Or at least the provisional truth.
William Hyde