Re: holes in the whole ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: holes in the whole ?
De : 69jpil69 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (jillery)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 17. Jun 2025, 09:01:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : What are you looking for?
Message-ID : <c4825k193lbqtflkqbsg63iva83m0sg48n@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 17:39:57 -0400, Dale <dalekellytoo@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
Hi,
>
https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
>
Are there no holes in the whole ?
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
>
Or are there holes in the whole ?
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism
>
Impermanence in definition ?
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impermanence
>
>
https://www.dalekelly.org/


The whole has holy holes.

--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge


Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Jun 25 * holes in the whole ?6Dale
17 Jun 25 `* Re: holes in the whole ?5jillery
17 Jun 25  `* Re: holes in the whole ?4RonO
19 Jun 25   `* Re: holes in the whole ?3Pro Plyd
19 Jun 25    +- Re: holes in the whole ?1Kerr-Mudd, John
19 Jun 25    `- Re: holes in the whole ?1jillery

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal