Sujet : Re: holes in the whole ?
De : admin (at) *nospam* 127.0.0.1 (Kerr-Mudd, John)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 19. Jun 2025, 09:19:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Dis
Message-ID : <20250619091949.b6a24c7b790ac18ed140a008@127.0.0.1>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 21:27:30 -0600
Pro Plyd <
invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote:
RonO wrote:
On 6/17/2025 3:01 AM, jillery wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 17:39:57 -0400, Dale <dalekellytoo@gmail.com>
>
https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
>
Are there no holes in the whole ?
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
>
Or are there holes in the whole ?
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism
>
Impermanence in definition ?
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impermanence
>
https://www.dalekelly.org/
>
The whole has holy holes.
>
"Holy holes Batman!"
Wholey mackeral!
"There's a whole in the bucket,
A whale? </Lady Bracknell>
I thought it was quite big for a mackerel.
dear Liza, dear Liza,
A whole in the bucket,
dear Liza a whole"
Well that's a whole in one!
Lancashire's the place for holes.
Probably a lot more now, what with road maintenance being so poor.
"A mystery hole has opened up on the M6. Police are looking into it."
-- Bah, and indeed Humbug.
holes in the whole ?
Re: holes in the whole ?