Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"
De : 69jpil69 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (jillery)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 27. Jun 2025, 09:34:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : What are you looking for?
Message-ID : <kils5k5632v5vpefd13g4p9n12fd1nna3q@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 22:47:05 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

>
https://youtu.be/vAFImV0iseM?feature=shared
>
He might as well eat squirrel stew and work "I reckon"
into the end of every sentence, if he's going to babble
about some non-existing Fermi "Paradox."
>
Again:  If I assume you don't like broccoli and you do,
it's not a paradox. It's an erroneous assumption. If you
assume aliens should be here and they not then, again,
it's not a paradox. It's an erroneous assumption.


Posting about things they say don't exist is another thing trolls do.

--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge


Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Jun03:47 * There is NO Fermi "Paradox"7JTEM
27 Jun09:34 `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"6jillery
27 Jun11:12  `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"5JTEM
28 Jun10:42   `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"4jillery
28 Jun12:41    `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"3JTEM
30 Jun09:12     `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"2jillery
1 Jul06:00      `- Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"1JTEM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal