Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"
De : jtem01 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (JTEM)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 27. Jun 2025, 11:12:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Eek
Message-ID : <103lqpn$397b$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/27/25 4:34 AM, jillery wrote:

Posting about
Words have meaning, getting right matters and it's vital
in science. There is no such thing as a Fermi "Paradox."
If reality upsets you, if getting it right is a bother
then a science group is definitely not any place you
should be.
Nobody should have to explain this to you.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Jun03:47 * There is NO Fermi "Paradox"7JTEM
27 Jun09:34 `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"6jillery
27 Jun11:12  `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"5JTEM
28 Jun10:42   `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"4jillery
28 Jun12:41    `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"3JTEM
30 Jun09:12     `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"2jillery
1 Jul06:00      `- Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"1JTEM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal