Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"
De : 69jpil69 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (jillery)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 30. Jun 2025, 09:12:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : What are you looking for?
Message-ID : <dmh46k9cqk903rcjssngtjoverlga73q9i@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 07:41:51 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

On 6/28/25 5:42 AM, jillery wrote:
>
Words have multiple meanings.
>
No. This is a scientific context. Ambiguity is the last thing
anyone can tolerate.


The substance of your expressed argument is semantic and ad hominems,
devoid of scientific context.


Plus you're just being mental here, digging in your heels and
refusing to acknowledge reality.
>
There is no Fermi "Paradox." STOP being a mindless follower
for once in that miserable excuse for a life, and think for
yourself.
>
"No! Status Quo ordered me to think 'Paradox' so I must!"


You aren't the only one who pretends to be the final authority on word
meanings.  You have lots of company here.

--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge


Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Jun03:47 * There is NO Fermi "Paradox"7JTEM
27 Jun09:34 `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"6jillery
27 Jun11:12  `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"5JTEM
28 Jun10:42   `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"4jillery
28 Jun12:41    `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"3JTEM
30 Jun09:12     `* Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"2jillery
1 Jul06:00      `- Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"1JTEM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal