Sujet : Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"
De : 69jpil69 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (jillery)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 30. Jun 2025, 09:12:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : What are you looking for?
Message-ID : <dmh46k9cqk903rcjssngtjoverlga73q9i@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 07:41:51 -0400, JTEM <
jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/28/25 5:42 AM, jillery wrote:
>
Words have multiple meanings.
>
No. This is a scientific context. Ambiguity is the last thing
anyone can tolerate.
The substance of your expressed argument is semantic and ad hominems,
devoid of scientific context.
Plus you're just being mental here, digging in your heels and
refusing to acknowledge reality.
>
There is no Fermi "Paradox." STOP being a mindless follower
for once in that miserable excuse for a life, and think for
yourself.
>
"No! Status Quo ordered me to think 'Paradox' so I must!"
You aren't the only one who pretends to be the final authority on word
meanings. You have lots of company here.
-- To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge