Re: Hunter Biden's 51 spies who lied are well overdue for their day in court

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message news:%9yUO.105844$S9Vb.7583@fx45.iad...

On 10/30/2024 2:47 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
>

In article <P1xUO.442113$FzW1.167298@fx14.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...

>
On 10/30/2024 12:25 PM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>

spammy, worthless gutless cocksucking little shitbag, lied:

>

On 10/29/2024 11:07 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:

On 10/29/2024 10:51 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:
>

In article <Vr8UO.345429$v8v2.161530@fx18.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...

>
On 10/29/2024 8:01 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>

>
>
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MKPTO.587225$1m96.346481@fx15.iad...

On 10/28/2024 8:39 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>

>
>
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:XIPSO.730960$_o_3.594314@fx17.iad...

On 10/25/2024 7:22 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>

>

>
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:K3wSO.324944$v8v2.116727@fx18.iad...

On 10/24/2024 10:55 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>

>

>
>
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:671a7d07$0$212407$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...

In article <IAuSO.565408$1m96.83990@fx15.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...

>
On 10/22/2024 12:28 PM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>

>

>
>
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:whSRO.294433$EEm7.288781@fx16.iad...

On 10/22/2024 11:32 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vf8m5r$1ipsv$1@dont-email.me:
>

>
>
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:vf8dfn$1h4b5$3@dont-email.me...

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:671715ef$2$1427653$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>

In article <XnsB212D3D254391629555@185.151.15.190>,

>

noemail@aol.com

says...

>
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vf6m7g$14c6j$6@dont-email.me:
>

On 2024-10-21, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

In article <XnsB21254CACFA4C629555@185.151.15.160>,
noemail@aol.com says...

>
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vf4b3g$l15m$7@dont-email.me:
>

On 2024-10-21, Leroy N. Soetoro

>
[erase vomit from fascist racist KKK shitbag "Leroy Soetoro"]
>

>
>
         There you have it, folks.
>
         Prosecute all media that contradicts
Dear Leader. His words are law, none must
be allowed to say differently.
>
>

>
Nope. Just the lying ones.

>
It was election interference plain and simple.
The FBI knew from the first week the Hunter laptop

>

surfaced that

it was real and so did the 51 Marxist liears who signed
that
letter.
>

>
         And yet Trump didn't even
mention it while campaigning.
And his Justice Dept filed no
criminal charges over it.

>
"at this point what does it matter?"
>
Hillary Clinton

>
If "Hunter's Laptop" doesn't matter, why do you conservaturds
    >>>>> keep
whining about it?

>
Shows the corruption of the Biden Administration and the

>

    >>>>

willingness

of Democrats to cover up such crimes even as attempting to  >>>>

>

impeach

others for the implication they did what Biden actually did.
>
Specifically engaging in a quid pro quo with Ukraine.

>
No. That is bullshit. *Trump* is the only one who sought a /quid

   >>

pro >>  >>
quo/ with

Ukraine.

>
We have Biden on camera confessing to it.

>
Nope.

>
What is fake about it?

>
It's not the whole interview, scooter. It omits Biden stating the reasons
why the U.S. and the rest of the west wanted Shokin fired.

>
I see.

>
You don't see, scooter. You're stupid and blind and you don't see.
>

so as long as you explain WHY there is going to be a quid pro quo then that
makes it ok?

>
The /quid/ was not for Joe Biden's benefit, scooter.

>
Rudy admits, finally, that it was indeed a quid pro quo made with Ukraine.

>
No, I don't "admit" that, scooter. It always was a /quid pro quo/ with
Ukraine.
What you're lying about, scooter, is who the /quid/ was for. It wasn't for Joe
Biden, scooter. That's what you're lying about, along with your lie that Biden
"confessed" to it.
>

Now tell me why he shouldn't be impeached as you claim needs to happen in
such
cases...

>
It only needs to happen when the /quid/ is for the corrupt politician
personally, as Trump's /quid pro quo/ demand of Zelenskiy was. Trump wanted
Zelenskiy to announce an investigation of Joe Biden in *Trump's* interest,
scooter. It was not in the interest of the U.S. for such an investigation
to be
announced. It was purely Trump's interest. The /quid/ in the /quid pro quo/
that
Biden presented to the Ukrainian government was in the interest of the entire
west, scooter. That's the difference.
>
Governments legitimately present /quid pro quo/ to other governments all the
time, scooter. That's what Biden did. That's not what Trump did, scooter.
>
Once again, you delude yourself into thinking you are a masterful debater in
Usenet. All you are is a masturbator, scooter, you incompetent fascist KKK
swine. You just *suck* at trolling.

>
He did.

>
No one claimed that Joe Biden did not speak, proudly, about getting Shokin
fired. Biden's /quid pro quo/ to Ukraine was ethical, legal and good policy.

>
So it's OK, for Biden, who is only the VP.. but criminal for Trump who is the
President and as such the CHIEF US Diplomat?

>
It was criminal for Trump because he was extorting Zelenskyy for his, Trump's,
sole benefit, scooter. He was abusing the power of his office to do so, scooter.
>

Speaks volumes about your personal character and ethics.

>
It speaks volumes about your appallingly shitty intellect, spammy, the you don't
know the difference between an ethical /quid pro quo/ and an unethical one.
scooter also doesn't know the difference.
>

>
Don't forget his double standard.

>
No double standard at work, scooter. You're still pretending you haven't seen my
authoritative instruction to you on ethical vs unethical /quid pro quo/. Here
are the examples again, scooter ? study them.
>
Examples of legal and ethical /quid pro quo/
>
     Father to teenage son: "If you mow the lawn, I'll give you $20."
>
     Mother to same son:    "If you don't clean up your room, you're not going to the game."
>
Examples of illegal and unethical /quid pro quo/
>
     scooter to criminal:   "I'll pay you $10,000 to kill my wife."
>
     scooter to subordinate employee: "Suck my cock if you want that promotion and raise."
>
     Trump to Zelenskyy:    "You're not getting the money and weapons unless you
                            announce a bogus investigation of Joe Biden."
>
>
Repeat after me, scooter: /quid pro quo/ is not inherently unethical.

>
Unless the pay off is a billion dollars.

No payoff.

Strange I seem to recall the Ukraine got the Billion dollars.. only after the investigator was fired.
PS, you know Rudy has lost it when he sabotages all the newsgroups.