Re: The damage Biden has done. It's nothing but a myth: NO damage

On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
 

In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...

>
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
>

In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...

>
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
>

In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...

>
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:

In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote:

>
No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
>

>
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
>

In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...

>
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
>

In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...

>
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
>

In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...

>
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>

>
>
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message
news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me...

On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:

In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...

>
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:

In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...

>
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in
news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com:
>

-hh wrote:
>

BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills

within

the GOP:
>
quote
Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
>
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..."
>
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
the labor force."
/quote

>
Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
>
Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
>
His response will be deleted, unread.

>
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs.

>
There will be and at higher wages.

>
Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
>
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages.
>
Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
>
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
>
-hh

>
The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.

>
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.

>
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s).

>
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter.

>
It is at my house.

>
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago?

>
You never did liar.

>
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
>

>
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled.

>
Trespassing.

>
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime.

>
Trespassing is a crime.

Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.

There you have it folks.

>
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.

>
Trespassing.

>
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.

>
Then why is it "unlawful"

>
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a civil tort.
>
You really work at being stupid, don't you?
>
      As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
      in the United States.
>
      United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
      https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
>
>
     Unlawful presence:
>
      https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
>
>
I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.

>
Trespassing

 Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a crime.