Sujet : Research : Big Brains Not Really Proportional to Animal Size
De : 26xh.0713 (at) *nospam* e6t5y.net (26xh.0712)
Groupes : talk.politics.misc alt.scienceDate : 09. Jul 2024, 05:49:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : zippy gate
Message-ID : <9cadna0O_KTYXBH7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com>
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
https://scitechdaily.com/brain-size-myth-debunked-with-new-evolutionary-insights/Researchers have found that brain size does not increase
proportionally with body size in larger animals,
challenging longstanding beliefs.
The study, which analyzed data from 1,500 species, shows
a non-linear relationship and highlights rapid evolutionary
changes in brain size among primates, rodents, and carnivores.
. . .
Well, just because muscles get larger does not mean
you need more brain to control them. A mouse brain
should be able to run a musk ox. Only more finely-
detailed control - say an elephant trunk - should
require more brain.
Brains TEND to get larger in proportion to physical
size, but clearly don't NEED to by and large. This
research debunks the size/brain assumption.
This research also SUGGESTS that sheer brain size
may only be coincidentally related to higher IQ.
"Lucy" may have been as smart as modern humans,
just "used it better". The intelligence of beasties
like parrots and covids suggests you can get a LOT
of IQ from a quite small volume of brain.