Liste des Groupes |
On 2025-06-04 00:14, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:>>
Nobody was disputing that Apple is a licensee of the “Unix”
trademark, and is entitled to use it to label their products.
>
This is why I like to use the term “*nix” with a meaning that has
nothing to do with the trademark, for how a system is supposed to
work. POSIX is a core part of that, of course. But there’s a lot
more to it. Linux and the BSDs conform to this “*nix” concept,
while Apple’s OSes do not.
To which "core parts" do Apple's OSes not conform exactly?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.