Re: Why Billie Piper Was Cast... [article]

On 6/06/2025 10:47 pm, Blueshirt wrote:

Daniel70 wrote:

On 6/06/2025 10:18 pm, Blueshirt wrote:

Daniel70 wrote:

On 6/06/2025 7:23 pm, Blueshirt wrote:

 Big Finish gave Paul McGann plenty of stories, so there's no
point in going back to him. It's easier for you to just put
everything since 1996 down to a bad dream from your point of
view and go forward with the 16th Doctor

 Surely that would then be "The New Ninth Doctor"!!

 I thought we had established that numbers were boring and we were
going with BillieDoctor?

 I've slowly been able to convert SOME of you to my way of thinking
.... but only recently. ;-P

 The more Doctors we have, the more confusing it gets.
 Especially when you get perverse people [like me] who want to include
Peter Cushing...
 (Probably just for the fun of upsetting the people who take it all so
seriously and don't want to include him!)
 Your system kind of works... to a degree.

Don't you worry about that .... I mean I am already aware that there
are/were TWO "DoctorPeter"s .... I'm guess/hoping, in THAT caser, the
context under discussion would make it apparent which DoctorPeter I was
referring to.
Maybe that's why, for a long time, I've wanted to refer to Number
5 as "Stephen Davison". Don't know why, but there MUST be a reason!!

IF we adapted it a bit and went with surnames though, it might just
work properly; so PiperDoc, TennantDoc, GatwaDoc, WhittakerDoc,
(etc.)
 Simples.

So you say. Read my above!! ^^^^

 

But then this "The New Ninth Doctor" hasn't happened YET so how
could I call Him/Her/It by any other name??

 Don't hold your breath!
 

Please don't tell me you forgot THAT... after all, YOU invented
the system!

 So why did YOU use the term "the 16th Doctor"?? Did YOU forget??

 Of course.
 Your excuse of "old age" works for me too... ;-)
 

You PUP!! ;-P
--
Daniel70