Re: Genesis of the Humans

On 30/06/2025 13:12, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:
 

On 29/06/2025 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

>
I'd tend to go with 'unreliable reader' for that part of
the story.

>
If you were as clever as you claim to be you would have gone
for 'unreliable translator' as you know full well most
history books, right or wrong, use the term Red Sea. So take
it up with them!

>
I don't need a translator fool! I can read the original
language.

 <face palm> Maybe re-read what I typed and understand it...
I wasn't on about YOU - I was on about the people who have
translated the various books that use the term Red Sea!
 Come down of your high horse and take a deep breath...
 

Only the stupid would think that a translation is trustworthy compared to the original text in the original language.

I don't care either way as in my opinion it's mainly a
fictitious story anyway... as I do not believe in any god,
extant or extinct.

>
Then you are an even bigger fool. The Exodus is well
documented by Egyptian inscriptions and historians, the basis
of Moses can easily be identified as Amenmesse = Messuy =
Ammosis, and the god of Moses names himself in the Bible as On
which means he was Ktes = Proteus = Setnakte since the
Pharaohs of Egypt were regarded as living deities. That's what
all gods were, human kings who were deified by the people they
ruled and their decedents because of all the wonderful things
they gave to mankind as described by Herodotus.

 There might be kings called gods by their people in times gone
past, but they were not the all-powerful imaginary gods in the
sky like the sheep of today follow and blindly worship.

No one ever believed they were all powerful. They spent most of their time rebelling against their fathers or brothers and fighting and deposing them, and kept sleeping with women who they were not married to.

 I also say; anyone believing in such fictitious mumbo jumbo like
gods parting seas for people, or creating females from the side
of a male, immediately show themselves to be gullible fools and
easily led.

They were not the sides of males. Did you bother to read Aristophanes speech in Plat's Symposium like I said. There were either male on one side and female on the other or male-male or female-female by which Aristophanes also attempts to explain homosexuality.
And I already told you it was the Reed Sea not the Red Sea that was parted, which can be easily achieved by an otter building a dam. It's otters that build dams right, not the other redenty things called beavers? Maybe it's both, either way they're not gods.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner