Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO

Liste des Groupes 
Sujet : Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO
De : anton (at) *nospam* mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 25. Mar 2024, 20:35:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID : <2024Mar25.193535@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : xrn 10.11
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
There is a significant demand for performance monitoring.   Note
that in addition to to standard performance monitoring registers,
AArch64 also (optionally) supports statistical profiling and
out-of-band instruction tracing (ETF).   The demand from users
is such that all those features are present in most designs.

Interesting.  I would have expected that the likes of me are few and
far between, and easy to ignore for a big company like ARM, Intel or AMD.

My theory was that the CPU manufacturers put performance monitoring
counters in CPUs in order to understand the performance of real-world
programs themselves, and how they should tweak the successor core to
relieve it of bottlenecks.

- anton
--
'Anyone trying for "industrial quality" ISA should avoid undefined behavior.'
  Mitch Alsup, <c17fcd89-f024-40e7-a594-88a85ac10d20o@googlegroups.com>

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Mar 24 * Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO15Paul A. Clayton
24 Mar 24 `* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO14MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 24  `* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO13Paul A. Clayton
25 Mar 24   +- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1Anton Ertl
25 Mar 24   +- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 24   `* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO10Anton Ertl
25 Mar 24    +- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1BGB
25 Mar 24    +* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO6John Dallman
26 Mar 24    i+- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1Anton Ertl
26 Mar 24    i`* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO4Anton Ertl
26 Mar 24    i `* Performance monitoring (was: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO)3Anton Ertl
26 Mar 24    i  +- Re: Performance monitoring (was: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO)1John Dallman
26 Mar 24    i  `- Re: Performance monitoring1MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 24    `* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO2Terje Mathisen
26 Mar 24     `- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1Terje Mathisen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal