Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz

Liste des Groupes 
Sujet : Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 07. Nov 2024, 16:23:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <6pmpijtkajbkj56h714ldothonrflfdqra@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:57:24 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:

On a sunny day (Wed, 6 Nov 2024 12:21:39 -0500) it happened "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in
<vgg8j4$k3i$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>:
>
"Jan Panteltje" <alien@comet.invalid> wrote in message news:vgf4jc$7vn5$1@solani.org...
On a sunny day (Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:00:42 -0500) it happened "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in
<vgdffb$ibt$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>:
>
"Jan Panteltje" <alien@comet.invalid> wrote in message news:vgccvm$6jk3$1@solani.org...
On a sunny day (Mon, 4 Nov 2024 11:31:01 -0500) it happened "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in
<vgass6$28u2$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>:
>
"Jan Panteltje" <alien@comet.invalid> wrote in message news:vg9pnu$ekhh$1@solani.org...
On a sunny day (Sun, 3 Nov 2024 23:06:04 -0500) it happened "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in
<vg9h7b$277o$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>:
>
Simulation isn't fast but if you let it complete and do an FFT on the last 30 seconds, it's 80dB down at all unwanted
harmonics.
There do however seem to be unwanted sidebands close in either side of 1KHz
Any suggestions for improvement?
>
Publish a circuit diagram.
Not that hard to make !
>
If you mean ASCII art, no thanks in the case of this circuit.
>
Easy to make a screen shot of your spice circuit and upload it one of those free image publication sites
>
You do not seriously expect readers to start ancient peesees and use millisoft widows emulators to run tea spices
https://panteltje.nl/panteltje/scope_tv/diagram.jpg
https://panteltje.nl/pub/swr_bridge_hl_lt_spice.gif
>
>
These appear to be LTSpice, so why can't you use it to view my circuits?
>
As I pointed out, am reading Usenet on a Raspbeery Pi4 8GB
Does everything here from spectrum analyzing to audio to video play
Why boot up an acient peesee to start a millisoft widows emulator
to look up some 80 deebee thingy that likely never has a practical use?
>
Well, Bessel came up with his functions long before FM broadcasting. Ok you can use Carson's rule but Wikipedia says:
"In 1922 he published a mathematical treatment of frequency modulation (FM), which introduced the Carson bandwidth rule."
Which pre dates FM broadcasting.
>
While designing my circuit I found this document very useful:
https://www.google.com/search?q=The+Field+Effect+Transistor+as+a+Voltage+Controlled+Resistor
It doesn't mention doing anything in a lab.
>
>
>
In any case if you can't simulate my circuits you won't be able to appreciate how brilliant a designer I am like Bill does.
>
80 deebee makes me wonder if you not better spend your time on making e-bikes from vipes...
com/gadgets/2024/11/disposable-vapes-from-a-music-festival-can-power-a-beefy-e-bike-20-miles/
>
And elteasprites simu is not worth a thing, reality is different from the models used
>
Reality is always different from models because models can never have everything that reality has.
But this does not mean that models aren't useful.
Simulation can do a lot to tell you you're going in the right direction.
This can save a lot of time when you get to do it in reality.
>
I stopped using it long ago (years)
My stuff works.
>
My sync separators worked too, back when I needed one.
They weren't quite like yours, I think I got an idea from Video Handbook by someone, I forget who.
>
>
ElTeaSprites is a bit like Hollowwood movies.
Burb .. I mean Kirk.. well
I do not question your genius,
>
Well you should.
Anyone who claims to be a genius might as well be telling you that they aren't.
>
Just one more thing.
Writing PC as peesee is fine if you're composing something like this:
https://www.google.com/search?q=I+halve+a+spelling+chequer
But doing it repeatedly with every other word starts to make your perceived age go down.
>
I use my spell shaker

Your posts are getting ever more annoying and unreadable.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Nov 24 * 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz64Edward Rawde
4 Nov 24 +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz62Jan Panteltje
4 Nov 24 i+* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz23Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 ii`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz22Edward Rawde
5 Nov 24 ii `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz21Bill Sloman
6 Nov 24 ii  `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz20Edward Rawde
6 Nov 24 ii   +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz8Jeroen Belleman
6 Nov 24 ii   i+- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Jan Panteltje
6 Nov 24 ii   i+- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Edward Rawde
6 Nov 24 ii   i`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz5john larkin
6 Nov 24 ii   i `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz4Jeroen Belleman
6 Nov 24 ii   i  `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz3john larkin
7 Nov 24 ii   i   `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz2Jeroen Belleman
7 Nov 24 ii   i    `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1john larkin
18 Nov 24 ii   `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz11Liz Tuddenham
19 Nov 24 ii    `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz10Edward Rawde
19 Nov 24 ii     `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz9Liz Tuddenham
19 Nov 24 ii      `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz8Edward Rawde
19 Nov 24 ii       `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz7Jeroen Belleman
19 Nov 24 ii        +- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Edward Rawde
19 Nov 24 ii        `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz5Joe Gwinn
19 Nov 24 ii         `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz4john larkin
19 Nov 24 ii          `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz3Joe Gwinn
20 Nov 24 ii           `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz2Jan Panteltje
20 Nov 24 ii            `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Joe Gwinn
4 Nov 24 i`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz38Edward Rawde
5 Nov 24 i `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz37Jan Panteltje
5 Nov 24 i  `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz36Edward Rawde
6 Nov 24 i   +- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Bill Sloman
6 Nov 24 i   `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz34Jan Panteltje
6 Nov 24 i    +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz20Bill Sloman
6 Nov 24 i    i`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz19Jan Panteltje
6 Nov 24 i    i +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz2Liz Tuddenham
6 Nov 24 i    i i`- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Jan Panteltje
6 Nov 24 i    i `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz16Bill Sloman
6 Nov 24 i    i  `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz15Liz Tuddenham
6 Nov 24 i    i   +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz13Bill Sloman
6 Nov 24 i    i   i`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz12Liz Tuddenham
7 Nov 24 i    i   i `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz11Jan Panteltje
7 Nov 24 i    i   i  `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz10Liz Tuddenham
7 Nov 24 i    i   i   `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz9Jan Panteltje
8 Nov 24 i    i   i    `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]8Liz Tuddenham
8 Nov 24 i    i   i     +- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]1Jan Panteltje
8 Nov 24 i    i   i     +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]2Cursitor Doom
8 Nov 24 i    i   i     i`- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]1Liz Tuddenham
8 Nov 24 i    i   i     `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]4ehsjr
9 Nov 24 i    i   i      `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]3Liz Tuddenham
9 Nov 24 i    i   i       `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]2Jan Panteltje
9 Nov 24 i    i   i        `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]1Liz Tuddenham
6 Nov 24 i    i   `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1john larkin
6 Nov 24 i    `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz13Edward Rawde
6 Nov 24 i     +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz8john larkin
7 Nov 24 i     i`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz7Liz Tuddenham
7 Nov 24 i     i +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz3Jeroen Belleman
7 Nov 24 i     i i`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz2Liz Tuddenham
7 Nov 24 i     i i `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Jeroen Belleman
7 Nov 24 i     i `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz3john larkin
7 Nov 24 i     i  +- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Bill Sloman
7 Nov 24 i     i  `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1john larkin
7 Nov 24 i     `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz4Jan Panteltje
7 Nov 24 i      +- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Edward Rawde
7 Nov 24 i      `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz2john larkin
7 Nov 24 i       `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Jan Panteltje
21 Nov 24 `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal