Sujet : Re: Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 08. Jun 2024, 16:48:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <86v86jl3g0k760hmv3ak1gc4ij54iea90f@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 07 Jun 2024 16:29:29 GMT,
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:
Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> writes:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:29:15 +0100, Robert Carnegie
>
>
I don't think I ever said it was a big film. It was a film about a
young man who leaves his small town for the big city and eventually
saves the town from dying of thirst. It has some action, but the story
is, how should I say this?, rather ordinary.=20
>
When the second reboot Bond film (/Qantum of Solace/) come out, it was
roundly ridiculed for treater water as a vital resource.
>
Cite?
After all these years? Probably Ebert. I was a big fan of Ebert.
Maltin ducks the issue by saying "prized natural resource" without
revealing what the resource is.
Ever seen Chinatown?
-- "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,Who evil spoke of everyone but God,Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes
Re: Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes
