Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper

Liste des Groupes 
Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 30. May 2025, 17:21:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <agmj3khabmeicrpvjdmtesgvrkqe717qiu@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 29 May 2025 14:57:07 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

On 5/29/2025 11:12 AM, Paul S Person wrote:

One of the funniest political cartoons I have seen in the last few
months shows Canada with "42 Electoral Votes" (number approximate
depending on memory accuracy) printed on it. The caption: "I didn't
see that coming".
 
If Canada were just one State, then 40 of those would be redistributed
from the other 50. This might well have a major impact, particularly
if Canadians united on hatred of Trump and the Republican party above
all else.
>
You speak as if Canada has a uniform population.  I know quite a few
Canadian engineers, they are fairly conservative as a rule.

So are a lot of judges appointed by Trump, but that doesn't stop them
from ruling against him. Being "conservative" is not the same as
supporting Trump, even in the USA.

And resentment at being converted into a State could /unify/ the
population. And not in Trump's (or the Republicans') favor.

Eventually, of course, this would relax. Might take a few centuries,
and I imagine the former Quebec would take a lot longer.
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Feb 25 * (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper47James Nicoll
25 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper42Charles Packer
19 Apr 25 i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper41Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
20 Apr 25 i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper36Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Scott Dorsey
20 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Lynn McGuire
20 Apr 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
21 Apr 25 i ii+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
21 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper6Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Dimensional Traveler
28 May 25 i ii  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
28 May 25 i ii   `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Cryptoengineer
28 May 25 i ii    `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
19 May 25 i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
20 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper18Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper17Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper16James Nicoll
29 May 25 i ii  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper15Paul S Person
29 May 25 i ii   `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper14Lynn McGuire
30 May 25 i ii    +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper10Dimensional Traveler
30 May 25 i ii    i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper9Scott Dorsey
30 May 25 i ii    i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii    i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Scott Dorsey
31 May17:17 i ii    i i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii    i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Bobbie Sellers
31 May17:21 i ii    i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
31 May18:26 i ii    i i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Bobbie Sellers
31 May19:16 i ii    i i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
3 Jun06:42 i ii    i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Titus G
30 May 25 i ii    `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii     +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
30 May 25 i ii     `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
19 May 25 i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
19 May 25 i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
28 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2quadibloc
3 Mar 25 i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1WolfFan
28 Feb 25 +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Lynn McGuire
19 May 25 `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal