Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear

On Wed, 25 Sep 2024, William Hyde wrote:

a denier, almost becoming violent.

 Poor child.  Of course, it's not even news when people working for IPCC get death threats.

 Ahh, sorry, then it is ok. Climate-hysteric! On the other hand, I am not
surprised. Anything goes when it comes to climate rationalists, but
critique of the climate nobility must be silenced, preferably with fines
and violence. The climate rationalist on the other hand, can apparently
be shot in the head. I get it.

>
You clearly didn't understand what I said, so here goes.
>
Climate scientists get death threats.  It's not rare.

Oh... maybe I should respond in kind with a awww... "boho". ;) No jokes
aside, regardless of position, ideology or religion I am not in favor of
death threats. Sorry to hear it! =(

On the other

hand, the nazis eventually lost power and so will eco-fascism. But I
honestly cannot blame your hostility.

>
Impugning the motives of your opponents is generally clear evidence of lack of confidence in your case.

It depends on the motives and the situation.

must say what they want to hear to get your rewards.

>
As I mentioned my conspiracy cash seems to be lost in the mail, and there's no progress being made on my Barony.

I think the trick, is to adopt the strategy of swedens own climate
clowns Greta and Rockström to get more media time. Maybe you could glue
yourself to a runway? ;)

It's almost as if the monetary compensation I got for my work consisted of my salary, and nothing else.

There you go!

For the record, only two of my papers, three at most, deal with the current climate change.  About as many as I have in solid state physics.
The majority of my work is in paleoclimate, specifically ice ages over the past 550 million years or so.
>
That's why I expect my conspiracy cheque to be pro-rated downwards.

This is the truth!

Thank God for the money from the solid-state conspiracy folks.  It's not easy fooling people into believing that the relativistic component of the anomalous g-shift in Lithium is .0022 when as any fool knows, it's actually .0023! But on such things does the coming quantum-facist state depend!

Pro tip! Blame it on the jews! Works every time!

As for evidence, likewise. I've presented iron clad proofs and arguments
and you have not been able to refute them.
 Finally, it turned out, that in the end, your arguments boiled down to
models, which as we saw, is completely unscientific given the variables,
the subjective nature, and how badly models work.

>
You've denied, often cut-and-pasting things you don't understand. You've tackled no evidence at all.

 

That's us climatologists.  A wild and lawless bunch, the terrors of academia.

 Of the world... not just academia. The climate rationalists are the new
jews.

>
Well in that case you're safe, since there's nothing rational about your position at all.

I disagree.