Re: (3-digit combination) was:

* Lawrence D'Oliveiro <usjehr$2pu3d$1@dont-email.me> :
Wrote on Sun, 10 Mar 2024 04:56:28 -0000 (UTC):

On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 09:49:15 +0530, Madhu wrote:

also this produces 2 results (0 6 2) and (0 4 2) -- the (0 4 2) result
wasn't reported in the solutions in the other languages, is it wrong?
(and therefore my whole approach)?

>
You wanted to talk about “dicksizing” ... I would say your approach is
overly long on code, and comes up short on correctness.

Well I can't see it.  Maybe it is a shortcoming in the other approaches
that misses this solution.
does "0 4 2" violate any the rules posted in the original picture?