Re: Instead scopes

Liste des Groupes 
Sujet : Re: Instead scopes
De : jl (at) *nospam* 650pot.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 29. Aug 2024, 19:47:42
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <pcg1djt6otqheh6vgi9len892jd21g1sn0@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:21:21 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:

On a sunny day (Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:43:39 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vaq1f2$jdj$1@dont-email.me>:
>
It's lot easier and quicker to bread-board a circuit in LTSpice than it
is to wire up a test circuit, but what that means is that you need to
make fewer real circuits and they are a lot more likely to work when tested.
>
That, on it's own, is enough to explain why labs look different today
than they did in the dark ages.
>
All it explains is boeings falling apart and astronuts ending up stuck at the ISS
and no moonlanding from the US, not even a probe.

The ISS and moon landings are super-expensive theatre. Neither
accomplishes anything.

Boeing and Microsoft have the same problem, bean counter money-mongers
have taken over from engineers.

Slimulations are _not_ realty and never will be.

Spice can be very handy. As Mike says, LT Spice's real function is to
train your instincts.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal