Liste des Groupes |
On 21-10-2024 12:46 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 12:12:22 -0700, john larkin wrote:>
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 14:59:18 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>"john larkin" <JL@gct.com> wrote in messageUnless you believe in physics/SI notation.
news:2rjahj1m5itht9k5nlh5p9q11onumbbb5s@4ax.com...On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:32:45 +0200, Jeroen Belleman>
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>On 10/20/24 19:18, Cursitor Doom wrote:>John Larkin has from time to time posted some elementary questions>
he likes to torture his job applicants with. I'd like to propose one
of my own.
>
If I'm measuring 218 ohms between points A and B in this diagram,
what is the value of Rx?
>
https://disk.yandex.com/i/hxjWx0tDUCzxiA
517 Ohms.
>
Jeroen Belleman
Does R330 mean 0.33 ohms?
>
I hate that sort of notation, like 2k47.
I keep having difficulty not using it in LTSpice.
>
0.33 ohms would be 0R33
>
>
>
So is R330 the reference designator?
Sorry, foreign notation. It's 330 ohms and 47 ohms.
Thought so.
Personally, I sometimes use the European style of placing decimal values
after the unit name, especially when space is limited as in a packed
schematic. 4k7 takes up slightly less space than 4.7k *and* there's no
chance of missing the decimal point. Likewise values like 6n8
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.