Re: Books Banned in Utah.

On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:03:29 -0000 (UTC), Mike Van Pelt
<usenet@mikevanpelt.com> wrote:

In article <jtmhbj9orggi70sh6289gqp4r1d1fj5is6@4ax.com>,
Paul S Person  <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 22:40:09 -0000 (UTC), Mike Van Pelt
<usenet@mikevanpelt.com> wrote:
>

In article <ru0abj1olq90jisctg39rem8clbrkplj5s@4ax.com>,
Paul S Person  <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

Why do I suspect that the Utah Education Dept would have no trouble
with /The Turner Diaries/. Or /The Protocols of the Elders of Zion/,
for that matter?

>
With that lying slander, I could equally accuse you of being one
with Stalin and Pol Pot if I were into lying slander.

>
You're the one who brought up /The Turner Diaries/. I merely added
another well-known work along the same lines.

>
You are the one who asserted that the Utah Education Department
would be fine with "The Turner Diaries" or "The Protocols of
the Elders of Zion."

Have they banned either of them? Didn't think so.

Regarding that Nazi screed, in fact, as demonstrated pretty
blatantly by recent events, it is the left that is the home
of neo-Nazi hatred of Jews, with the usual student radicals
marching to demand a *Judenrein* Middle East, and attacking
Jewish students, not for any support of Israel or current
Israeli policies, but *merely because they are Jewish*.
>
Not to mention applauding the biggest massacre of Jews
since the unlamented demise of Adolph Hitler. 

Anti-semitism infects both left and right wing-nuts. The ones on the
left do so as part of their support of foreign terror organizations,
which is very unwise as it could lead to various legal entanglements.
The one on the right do as a result of their membership in domestic
terror organizations, which is just as unwise for the same reason. But
then wing-nuts are particularly bright, however well-educated they may
be.

I have long noted that wing-nuts exist on all sides. But only the
Republicans have actually nominated two of them for President/VP.

Note: this is pre-Democratic convention, which means that the
Democrats haven't nominated /anybody/ yet. And, if you think Kamala is
written in stone, well, Joe was written in the same stone up until
quite recently. Seeing the Republican reaction to changing the
probable candidate might tempt the Democrats to change it once again
just to torment Trump, who can say?
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"