Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!

Liste des Groupes 
Sujet : Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!
De : john_nospam (at) *nospam* jhall.co.uk (John Hall)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Date : 28. Jan 2025, 10:00:06
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Turnpike/6.07-M (<NsZUh$oBFYse9U86ak$PHmHQqf>)
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$1@dont-email.me>, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> writes
On 2025-01-27 09:50:09 +0000, John Hall said:
>
In message <vn6cpu$6jeo$1@dont-email.me>, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> writes
<snip>
There is no discussion. Doctor Who definitely can belong in rec.arts.sf.tv and rec.arts.tv and rec.arts.tv.uk.misc among a few other newsgroups.
 rec.arts.sf.tv certainly. I think the other two groups would be pushing things, since the great majority of their readers are unlikely to have watched or be interested in the show. (More fool them, I agree, but  their wishes should be respected.)
>
Doctor Who is a TV show, so by definition it can be posted about in general TV newsgroups such as rec.arts.tv and rec.arts.tv.uk.misc that are not specific to a particular show / genre.
That would be the case if there weren't any more specific groups for DW, but since there are it seems reasonable to suppose that anyone really interested in the show will be subscribed to at least one of those more specific groups.

>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor Who (or whatever show) posted there, then that's their problem. I don't like 90% of the shows they post about either, but they're certainly allowed to post about them and they are far more on topic than all the silly political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
>
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
--
John Hall
                "I look upon it, that he who does not mind his belly,
                 will hardly mind anything else."
                                            Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-84)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jan 25 * Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!15Your Name
27 Jan 25 `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!14John Hall
27 Jan 25  `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!13Your Name
28 Jan 25   `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!12John Hall
29 Jan 25    `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!11Daniel70
29 Jan 25     +* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!8Your Name
29 Jan 25     i`* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!7%
29 Jan 25     i +* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!5%
30 Jan 25     i i+* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!3%
30 Jan 25     i ii`* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!2%
30 Jan 25     i ii `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Daniel70
30 Jan 25     i i`- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Daniel70
30 Jan 25     i `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1%
30 Jan 25     `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!2Daniel70
30 Jan 25      `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Your Name

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal