Re: (3-digit combination) was:

Liste des Groupes 
Sujet : Re: (3-digit combination) was:
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.lisp
Date : 10. Mar 2024, 06:56:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <usjehr$2pu3d$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 09:49:15 +0530, Madhu wrote:

also this produces 2 results (0 6 2) and (0 4 2) -- the (0 4 2) result
wasn't reported in the solutions in the other languages, is it wrong?
(and therefore my whole approach)?
You wanted to talk about “dicksizing” ... I would say your approach is overly long on code, and comes up short on correctness.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Mar 24 * Re: (3-digit combination) was:5Madhu
10 Mar 24 +* Re: (3-digit combination) was:3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Mar 24 i`* Re: (3-digit combination) was:2Madhu
11 Mar 24 i `- Re: (3-digit combination) was:1Madhu
10 Mar 24 `- Re: (3-digit combination) was:1Paul Rubin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal