Re: No fault cell phone law

Liste des Groupes 
Sujet : Re: No fault cell phone law
De : bashley101 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (The Real Bev)
Groupes : comp.mobile.android
Date : 17. Mar 2024, 06:41:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None, as usual
Message-ID : <ut5s9m$3bjd7$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 Thunderbird/68.12.1
On 3/16/24 4:53 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-03-16, Thuma <thuma@att.net> wrote:
Anyone running their mouth on a cell phone and jaywalking should be considered fair game to stop and beat the shit out of them, or just run them over.
>
It is not the responsibility of automobile drivers with the right-of-way to yield to someone who is more concerned with their self-absorbed rudeness than personal safety.
>
Take a bat to their skulls or just hit the gas and run over them.
>
Pass a law to protect these drivers and absolve them of liability.
 Pick any high traffic road in NYS and if you travel any decent distance you are certain to see
accidents and the vast majority of them are rear end accidents.
 It's out of control.
My grandson and I were both hit in signaled crosswalks by women who couldn't possibly have hit us if they'd been watching where they were going.  I was lucky and the bitch only broke my bicycle seat so I just yelled at her;  grandson spent several days in the hospital and HIS bitch's insurance didn't cover the whole cost.
There should have been jail time for his bitch.
--
Cheers, Bev
   I'd rather not have neighbors. If I can see them, they're too close.
   In fact, if I can see them through a rifle scope, they're too close.
                                                 -- Anonymous Coward

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Mar 24 * Re: No fault cell phone law36The Real Bev
17 Mar 24 `* Re: No fault cell phone law35Stan Brown
17 Mar 24  +* Re: No fault cell phone law7Frank Slootweg
17 Mar 24  i+- Re: No fault cell phone law1Stan Brown
17 Mar 24  i`* Re: No fault cell phone law5The Real Bev
17 Mar 24  i `* Re: No fault cell phone law4Frank Slootweg
17 Mar 24  i  `* Re: No fault cell phone law3The Real Bev
18 Mar 24  i   `* Re: No fault cell phone law2Frank Slootweg
18 Mar 24  i    `- Re: No fault cell phone law1Andrew
17 Mar 24  +* Re: No fault cell phone law4AJL
17 Mar 24  i+- Re: No fault cell phone law1Frankie
18 Mar 24  i`* Re: No fault cell phone law2Stan Brown
18 Mar 24  i `- Re: No fault cell phone law1AJL
17 Mar 24  `* Re: No fault cell phone law23Andrew
17 Mar 24   +* Re: No fault cell phone law2The Real Bev
18 Mar 24   i`- Re: No fault cell phone law1Andrew
20 Mar 24   `* Re: No fault cell phone law20Carlos E.R.
20 Mar 24    +* Re: No fault cell phone law17AJL
20 Mar 24    i+* Re: No fault cell phone law10Carlos E.R.
20 Mar 24    ii`* Re: No fault cell phone law9Carlos E.R.
20 Mar 24    ii `* Re: No fault cell phone law8Andrew
21 Mar 24    ii  `* Re: No fault cell phone law7Hank Rogers
21 Mar 24    ii   `* Re: No fault cell phone law6Andrew
21 Mar 24    ii    +- Re: No fault cell phone law1Andrew
23 Mar 24    ii    `* Re: No fault cell phone law4The Real Bev
23 Mar 24    ii     +- Re: No fault cell phone law1Your Name
24 Mar 24    ii     +- Re: No fault cell phone law1Harry S Robins
29 Mar 24    ii     `- Re: No fault cell phone law1sms
20 Mar 24    i`* Re: No fault cell phone law6The Real Bev
20 Mar 24    i `* Re: No fault cell phone law5Carlos E.R.
20 Mar 24    i  `* Re: No fault cell phone law4The Real Bev
21 Mar 24    i   `* Re: No fault cell phone law3Indira
21 Mar 24    i    `* Re: No fault cell phone law2The Real Bev
21 Mar 24    i     `- Re: No fault cell phone law1Indira
21 Mar 24    `* Re: No fault cell phone law2Frank Slootweg
24 Mar 24     `- Re: No fault cell phone law1Andrew

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal