Liste des Groupes |
In article <uu3vv9$3kt4j$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
wrote:
On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
>
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
>
and put it in a big wine jar?Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling itAnd yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
>
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.