Re: Mail-In Voting

On 3/31/24 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uubohs$1qc9d$6@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
 

On 3/30/24 4:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uu9fbs$13o15$6@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 3/29/24 5:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <mjbe0jdc0o8dq1qknqr5k0153b0rbkgai4@4ax.com>,
    shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:02:49 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

 

If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then
periodically checks in to see how you're doing, why would there
be less apples at the last check-in than there were at the first?

>
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible
there's no way to know just what happened.

>
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We
didn't see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise.
Same with the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up.
Just like trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild
coincidence.

>
Yet we keep running into this sort of thing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0xbgHmfjj4
>
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
>
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.

>
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
>
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.

>

Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.

>
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.

 

Biden wants to add border agents...

 ...to process illegals into the country more efficiently. Not to, you
know, patrol the border and keep people out.
 

beef up security...

 ...which he could do in one morning's work by rescinding his EOs. He
doesn't need any Republican help or cooperation. Weird that he won't do
that, huh?
 

beef up the legal system to handle it...

 ...and by 'handle it', he means more admin staff to help get the
illegals into America faster and more efficiently

>
And Republicans oppose it.  Why?

 Because it's a shit bill that not only does nothing to secure the border
but explicitly allows up to 8000 unvetted illegals into the country
every day.
 

Nope.  It's a Republican Wish List bill.  You fuckers wrote it yourselves, and it's the strongest immigration bill and border security bill in 50 years.
Stop lying about it.  We all can read it for ourselves.
Fox Fucking News blasted Republicans.
Fox. Fucking. News. is calling you a liar, too.

Fox News Blasts Republicans for Killing 'Strongest' Border Bill
Published Feb 15, 2024 The Chief Political Analyst at Fox News has criticized hardline Republicans for killing a border bill negotiated in the Senate.
 "I think these are a couple of issues that put Republicans in peril of looking like literally a do-nothing Congress," Brit Hume told the station on Wednesday, referring to the border security bill shot down by the House and the potential rejection of funding for Ukraine.

The bill, released by senators on Sunday, would also make it harder to claim asylum at the border and expand detention facilities, among other efforts to reduce the number of migrants.

It was a bi-partisan bill crafted mostly by Republicans.  And it was like the Trump policy.

The three main negotiators on the Senate bill — Republican Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma, Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut — have all pushed back on criticism of the bill. They emphasize that it would keep more people out instead of allowing more people to come in — and that migrants would not be able to apply for asylum at all if illegal border crossings reach certain numbers.
 The policy is similar to one first used by Trump. Known as Title 42, it justified the quick expulsion of migrants from the country in the name of stopping the spread of COVID-19.

Lankford has repeatedly emphasized that the emergency authority “is not designed to let 5,000 people in, it is designed to close the border and turn 5,000 people around.”
 After meeting with Republicans in the Capitol Monday evening, Lankford told reporters that people understand it once he explains it, “but it’s been said wrong so many times that people immediately just go back to, ‘this lets 5,000 people in a day,’ which is just factually wrong, but if you say it enough, it just sounds true.”

You are one shitty liar, you know that?
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0
Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0