Sujet : Re: Is this the end of SLJ? -- Spam was the main factor (that destroyed SLJ)?
De : HenHanna (at) *nospam* devnull.tb (HenHanna)
Groupes : sci.lang.japan news.admin.net-abuse.usenet news.groupsDate : 30. Jun 2024, 22:17:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v5seg5$m194$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/25/2023 10:09 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article <RJZgNzzq7otMBCT65@bongo-ra.co>,
Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:41:20 -0000 (UTC)
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
Is this like comp.arch or comp.lang.c?
>
I'm not sure what you're asking. If the question is whether the spam on
sci.lang.japan is as bad as it is on comp.arch or comp.lang.c , I
don't know. Try the groups through a server which doesn't seem to filter
the spam (news.cyber23.de doesn't seem to do so) and with your own filters
off and you can form your own opinion.
It is similar spam injected in a similar way. Much like the spam on
comp.os.vms and on comp.protocols.time.ntp. It is more or less a universal
problem across usenet. Many sites sites just dump all Google postings or
dump anything with "UTF-8" in a malformed subject line.
--scott
so you think Spam was the main factor (that destroyed SLJ)?
Re: Is this the end of SLJ? -- Spam was the main factor (that destroyed SLJ)?
Re: Is this the end of SLJ? -- Spam was the main factor (that destroyed SLJ)?