Sujet : Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who - Logopolis
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv rec.arts.tv can.arts.sfDate : 08. Jul 2024, 13:08:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v6gksq$s4vd$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Joe Pfeiffer wrote on 8/7/24 12:15 pm:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) writes:
In article <1bjzhxx6g0.fsf@pfeifferfamily.net>, Joe Pfeiffer
<pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote:
You can't imagine the level of my lack of interest in AI
generated "reviews"... One or two were amusing; we're past that
now. Please stop.
i RATHER MAKE THE CASE HOW IMPERFECT ai IS.
The case has been made. The horse you're beating died long ago.
... but, Joe, you must realise by now that 'The Doctor' is a bit SLOW!!
You certainly wouldn't want him as your Doctor!!
-- Daniel
Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who - Logopolis
Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who - Logopolis