Re: Tulsi Gabbard Placed on Terror Watch List After Criticizing Biden/Harris Admin

On 8/13/2024 1:51 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v9fve4$3uvrs$1@dont-email.me>,
  moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

On 8/12/2024 11:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Aug 12, 2024 at 8:31:13 PM PDT, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
>

On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:13:23 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>

In article <585lbj5ghnhj1t62oklmqr48n6dktajqfm@4ax.com>,
   shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>

   On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:55:57 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
      >In article <v9dv7t$3fq89$1@dont-email.me>,
   > moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
   >
   >> On 8/12/2024 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
   >
   >> > Immediately after going on national TV and criticizing the
   >> > Biden/Harris administration, former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard
   >> > was placed on TSA's Quiet Skies terror watchlist, which subjects
   >> > her to FAM surveillance, bomb dog screening, and aggressive
   >> > pat downs and luggage screening every time she boards a flight.
   >> >
   >> > https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RJBygvtNfSY&pp=ygUaTWF0dCB0YWliYmk6I
   >> > HR1bHNpIGdhYmJhcmQ%3D
   >>
   >> Did you watch your own video? The outrage here (if there is one) is
   >> that such a hidden haphazard watchlist exists, and not that Gabbard
   >> would somehow get placed on it.
   >
   >There can be more than one outrage.
   >
   >> Ted Kennedy was on such a list.
   >
   >He was accidentally placed on it because he had a common name. How
   >many other Tulsi Gabbards are out there, do you suppose, that could
   >make the same excuse here even remotely credible?
   >
   >And Kennedy's list was one for actual suspected terrorists and so had
   >some basic justification for its existence. Quiet Skies is apparently
   >for anyone the government merely deems problematic.
      And it looks like it was created during the Trump administration.

>
Then he should have to answer for it. As should Biden/Harris (they're
one and the same these days) for Gabbard's placement on it. Or any of
the people from Jan. 6 who are on it merely because they attended
Trump's speech on the Ellipse that day and never went near the Capitol.
That's actually an impeachable-level offense as far as I'm concerned.

>
Wouldn't that depend upon who made the decision to add her to the
list. It's one thing if the President was to have made the decision
but what if it was someone in the TSA that decided to add those names
to the list.

>
Has the president fired that person? If not, we can assume he endorses that
decision and he should therefore be impeached.

>
Nonsense. If the President fired that person, "we" would assume he's
merely trying to hide his endorsement and should therefore be impeached.

 As usual, I have no idea what you're talking about.

You're pretending that there's some action the President could take that would pry you from your latest conspiracy theory.