Sujet : Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who - Survival
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 19. Aug 2024, 11:03:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9v58q$2qu1g$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
The Doctor wrote on 18/8/24 10:27 pm:
In article <xn0opppj6awmiv001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
>
Here are the individual and overall ratings:
>
- **Part One: 8/10**
- **Part Two: 8.5/10**
- **Part Three: 9/10**
>
**Overall Rating: 8.5/10**
>
8.5? WTF?! <shocked face>
>
They definitely have to be AI generated ratings anyway as no
sane person would rate any episodes of "Survival" that highly...
>
"Survival" is a well-crafted and thoughtful story,
offering a strong conclusion to the Seventh Doctor’s
era with a mix of action, emotion, and introspection.
>
As if.
>
Survival was a load of bollocks!
>
"Survival" brought the Sylvester McCoy era, and the classic era
of Doctor Who, to a fitting end. Like a badly injured horse that
needed putting out of its misery... BANG!
You sir are full of BS! I do agree with the rating, and your cut-and-lie
leaves no discussion for plot review.
YOU, Gobble-de-gook, have already done a 'plot review', haven't YOU, Gobble-de-gook .... and Blueshirt has cut that part of YOUR review that he is not responding to, just as any GOOD UseNeter SHOULD DO .... but, in any case, Gobble-de-gook, YOUR COMPLETE 'review' is still all out there, Gobble-de-gook!!
If YOU, Gobble-de-gook, can't set YOUR UseNet Agent up correctly, Gobble-de-gook, that's YOUR problem, Gobble-de-gook, not ours!!
-- Daniel