Re: Instead scopes

On 1/09/2024 10:41 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Sun, 1 Sep 2024 21:38:47 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vb1job$1fp20$1@dont-email.me>:
 

On 1/09/2024 9:06 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Sun, 1 Sep 2024 17:45:46 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vb163a$1dt9b$1@dont-email.me>:
>

On 30/08/2024 2:21 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:43:39 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vaq1f2$jdj$1@dont-email.me>:

<snip>

Explosion isn't quite the right concept. The universe is pictured as
starting off very small, very dense, and expanding rapidly, but it
created the space it expanded into  as it expanded.

 Only in the imagination of mathematicians who are starting as kids to try to do a divide by nothing (zero)
and then create infinities such as black's holes.

You've got that backwards. Black holes are entirely finite, because they contain enough mass to close space back in  on itself.

Tip: there are no infinities in nature, something always will give way.

With black holes it's the curvature of space-time.

Same with Ohm's law, 1 V in zero Ohm gves infinte curent , no it does not.
Understand electrons, without electrons Ohms law is useless.

Georg Ohm published his law in 1827, 70 years before J J Thompson discovered the electron. It works just as well for other charge carriers.

Without a mechanism onestoines babble is useless

By which you mean that you can't understand it.

Without onestine's babble things become fun.
Without Ohm's law and with electrons things become fun.

Ask any ten year-old.

Albert's is as dumb as is electricity without electrons.

 

Neither CERN nor ITER is designed to go anywhere

 Right. they are job creation programs for Albert's parrots.

Neither CERN nor ITER have much to do within Einstein's interests.
CERN is about nuclear physics, which has moved on quite a way from Einstein's insights, and ITER is about getting nuclear fusion to work, which is even less dependent on Einstein's insights - it does depend on E=MC^2, but once that had been used to explain the mass defect in elements heavier than hydrogen, Einstein didn't have any real involvement.
The popular press made a lot of fuss about Einstein, but Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg, Schroedinger, Lorentz Planck and Pauli were all in much the same class.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney