Re: "F-You": Megyn Kelly Blasts Taylor Swift Endorsement Of Kamala

On 9/24/2024 12:58 AM, BTR1701 wrote:

moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

On 9/23/2024 1:29 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <vcs0oa$2okok$1@dont-email.me>, moviePig
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

On 9/22/2024 6:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <vcq6tu$2cmei$1@dont-email.me>, moviePig
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

On 9/22/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <vcfcct$6ip7$3@dont-email.me>, moviePig
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

On 9/18/2024 1:44 PM, suzeeq wrote:

 On 9/18/2024 9:34 AM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Sep 18, 2024 at 9:17:14 AM PDT, "suzeeq"
<suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
 

On 9/18/2024 9:11 AM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Sep 18, 2024 at 8:41:07 AM PDT, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

 

Especially given how electric vehicles behave
when it turns really cold. Not something you
want when even your nearest neighbor may be miles away.

 

Not a concern for Gavvy. We have plenty of
places that get snow and freezing temps in
California but the Climate Cult doesn't care.

 

Not like in the northern tier of states, where
temps are often below zero, and sometimes down to
-40 with the wind chill.

 At an average of 411.5 inches per year, Donner
Pass, California, is one of the snowiest places in
the contiguous United States. Four times since 1880
total snowfall at Donner Summit has exceeded 775 inches and topped 800 inches in both 1938 and 1952.
Winds in the pass can also become extreme and wind
gusts in excess of 100 miles per hour are common
during winter storms. Winter temperatures in the area often drop below 0°F for weeks at a time each
year; the all-time record low for California of
-45°F (real temperature without wind chill) was
recorded in the Sierra Nevada in the area around
the Donner Pass in January 1937.
 

I know, I used to live on the N shore of Tahoe in the
late 1970s. However, it seldom gets that cold there
anymore. When the temps gets below 0 it's only for a
week. You're quoting conditions tat haven't been see
for 70 to 85 years ago. Things have changed.

 That's climate-alarmist talk. Your thermometer must be
Leftist...

 Looks like it's time for Part 2 in my "How the Media and
Democrats Lie to You" series. Earlier I detailed how they
lie to you about crime. This time we'll learn  how they
lie to you about 'climate change'.
 The L.A. Times recently published the latest in what
seems to be a never-ending series designed to scare you
into converting to the Climate Cult.
 https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-09-09/hotter-drier-differe
>
 

nt-how-climate-change-will-alter-l-a

 Basically, it's all about how 'climate change' will alter
your life in L.A:
 "Will it be a fiery landscape where sizzling sidewalks
cause second-degree burns, wildfire smoke blots out the
sun, and water flows only sometimes, and mostly not at
all? Or will California's penchant for innovation be our
salvation?"
 ("Salvation"... notice the religious tones and
connotations associated with stories like this.)
 "The youth of our planet will have to live in the
environment we've created for them but there's still time
to seize control of our collective destiny."
 ("Collective"... notice the socialist/communist verbiage
associated with stories like this.)
 The article and all others like it are peppered with dire
claims about heat records being blown away:
 "Southern California wildfires spread with record heat."
 "Brutal heatwave breaks records across Southern
California."
 The constant drumbeat about shattered temperature records
is interesting because they almost always just make the
assertion that this is record heat but never actually
back it up with facts.
 So I went to LA Almanac.com and looked up the day-by-day
record high temperatures in the month of September for
Los Angeles.
 Month/Day   Record High    Record Low Sep 1       110
(1955)     49 (1901) Sep 2       108 (1955)     51
(1881) Sep 3       103 (1988)     51 (1892) Sep 4
110 (1988)     52 (1892) Sep 5       105 (1984)     50
(1898) Sep 6       111 (2020)     48 (1898) Sep 7
103 (1949)     50 (1884) Sep 8       103 (1984)     47
(1901) Sep 9       102 (1956)     48 (1884) Sep 10
103 (1983)     52 (1893) Sep 11      101 (1983)     48
(1901) Sep 12      102 (1971)     48 (1884) Sep 13
106 (1971)     48 (1884) Sep 14      100 (2012)     48
(1898) Sep 15      103 (2012)     49 (1895) Sep 16
103 (2014)     48 (1884) Sep 17      108 (1913)     46
(1884) Sep 18      103 (1939)     48 (1884) Sep 19
104 (1939)     49 (1907) Sep 20      107 (1939)     49
(1900) Sep 21      108 (1885)     47 (1880) Sep 22
104 (1883)     48 (1895) Sep 23      104 (1978)     44
(1880) Sep 24      106 (1978)     45 (1880) Sep 25
107 (1978)     48 (1879) Sep 26      109 (1963)     48
(1893) Sep 27      113 (2010)     46 (1901) Sep 28
106 (1963)     49 (1901) Sep 29      102 (1999)     44
(1880) Sep 30      105 (1906)     48 (1886)
 What can we conclude from this data?
 Well, first and foremost, that the propagandists at the
L.A. Times are full of shit. They're literally lying to
promote an agenda.
 September is a hot month in L.A. and has been going back
to the 1800s, long before SUVs, carbon footprints,
'climate change'. And notably, while there are some
record highs set post-2000, not one of them is in 2024,
which makes the Times' claim that our current heat wave
is 'record heat' or is 'breaking records' a complete
falsehood.
 And these are the people who are supposedly
'fact-checking' everything from your social media posts
to your presidential candidates.
 Who's fact-checking the fact-checkers?

 The record lows occurred near or prior to the turn of last
century, while the record highs are generally later. Sounds
like warming to me.

 What part of 'record-breaking' do you not understand?

 I didn't read the claims, your or theirs.

 Then you're not qualified to comment on this discussion. The only
thing you can do is try to change the subject, which is exactly
what you did.

 "Not qualified"???

 Yes, if you haven't read either my claims or the newspaper's, by
definition you don't what's being discussed here. In other words, not
qualified.

"Not qualified"???  Wow, congrats on your promotion to Gruppenführer!
I commented on a portion of your post.  Moreover, and instructively to
you, I didn't delete the remainder as though it never happened...

As for "record-breaking", records are always being broken
somewhere ...making assertions or denials meaningless. Meanwhile,
I'd guess they care more about eyeballs than agendas, but, then, I
can't read minds.

 The L.A. Times doesn't care about money (eyeballs). If it did, then
it wouldn't be cratering its business with nothing but wokeness.
Every day the headlines consist of story after story about racism,
transgenderism, climate change, and how we need more illegals and
vagrants or we need to spend more tax money on them. Even it's
leftist readers are tired of it and it's losing several hundred
million dollars a year as subscription numbers collapse. The
billionaire that bought the Times gave it to his activist daughter to
play with and lets it run at a loss, but even he has his limits.
However, rather than, you know, change the paper back to a real news
organization, his solution was to just halve the newsroom and fire
hundreds of people.

You could be right that the L.A. Times doesn't care about money.
However, here in America, that would be what's called a 'black swan',
one akin to a repeal of gravity...