Sujet : Re: Apache + mod_php performance
De : davef (at) *nospam* tsoft-inc.com (Dave Froble)
Groupes : comp.os.vmsDate : 07. Oct 2024, 05:35:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdvoeq$1jerg$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 10/6/2024 11:12 AM, Michael S wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 17:43:02 -0000 (UTC)
cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) wrote:
>
In article <vdp8kn$a67s$1@dont-email.me>,
Dave Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> wrote:
On 10/3/2024 7:00 PM, Chris Townley wrote:
[snip]
I don't remember George, but we have certainly woken up Dave! ;)
>
and I am sure the troll is happy...
>
I'm not sure whether I've been insulted?
>
I suspect the "troll" reference is to Lawrence. Sadly, Arne can
not help himself when it comes to resisting arguing with that
clown.
>
- Dan C.
>
>
Troll or not, but the question about ability to pass open TCP socket to
child process (or, may be, to unrelated process) under VMS is a good
question.
As a lurker, I am waiting for the expert answer with interest.
>
Well, some of the issue is in the text of the question. What does one mean be "pass socket"?
When creating a socket, one can specify it to be shared. What I was doing was passing the information to a worker process, then letting the worker process open the existing socket.
So, would that be considered "passing an open socket"?
I can post some of the development code is anyone is interested. I was working on the inter-process communications when I dropped the project. I believe I did open the shared socket in the worker process.
-- David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: davef@tsoft-inc.comDFE Ultralights, Inc.170 Grimplin RoadVanderbilt, PA 15486