Re: oscillator gain

Liste des Groupes 
Sujet : Re: oscillator gain
De : cd999666 (at) *nospam* notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 20. Oct 2024, 17:58:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vf3cs6$g5ng$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 07:05:08 -0700, john larkin wrote:

If the loop gain of an oscillator is slightly over 1.00, oscillations
gain amplitude. Just under 1.00, they die out.
 
Economies are like that.
 
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/10/19/record-633000-business-in-
britain-on-brink-of-collapse-report/
 
and politicians don't understand control theory.

Regulating an economy through monetary policy (interest rates - the usual
method) is far more problematic than most folks would ever imagine. It's
been likened to pulling a brick with an elastic band - and that's not a
bad analogy. It's incredibly difficult to get the rate set right in order
to produce long-term stability and the optimally desired 'goldilocks
economy'. That's why there's normally a panel of economic advisers
involved. It's too complex a decision for just one man.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Oct 24 * oscillator gain40john larkin
19 Oct 24 +* Re: oscillator gain9Jan Panteltje
19 Oct 24 i`* Re: oscillator gain8john larkin
19 Oct 24 i `* Re: oscillator gain7Jan Panteltje
19 Oct 24 i  `* Re: oscillator gain6john larkin
20 Oct 24 i   `* Re: oscillator gain5Jan Panteltje
20 Oct 24 i    `* Re: oscillator gain4Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 i     `* Re: oscillator gain3john larkin
20 Oct 24 i      `* Re: oscillator gain2Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 i       `- Re: oscillator gain1john larkin
19 Oct 24 +* Re: oscillator gain25Cursitor Doom
19 Oct 24 i+- Re: oscillator gain1john larkin
20 Oct 24 i+- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i+* Re: oscillator gain10Jan Panteltje
20 Oct 24 ii`* Re: oscillator gain9john larkin
20 Oct 24 ii +* Re: oscillator gain3Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 ii i`* Re: oscillator gain2john larkin
21 Oct 24 ii i `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 ii +* Re: oscillator gain4Edward Rawde
21 Oct 24 ii i`* Re: oscillator gain3john larkin
21 Oct 24 ii i `* Re: oscillator gain2Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 ii i  `- Re: oscillator gain1Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 ii `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i`* Re: oscillator gain12Liz Tuddenham
20 Oct 24 i +* Re: oscillator gain3Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 i i+- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i i`- Re: oscillator gain1john larkin
20 Oct 24 i `* Re: oscillator gain8john larkin
20 Oct 24 i  +* Re: oscillator gain3Joe Gwinn
20 Oct 24 i  i`* Re: oscillator gain2Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 i  i `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i  `* Re: oscillator gain4john larkin
20 Oct 24 i   +* Re: oscillator gain2Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 i   i`- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 i   `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 +- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 `* Re: oscillator gain4Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24  +- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24  `* Re: oscillator gain2john larkin
22 Oct 24   `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal