The whole "Puppies" furor

Liste des Groupes 
Sujet : The whole "Puppies" furor
De : usenet (at) *nospam* mikevanpelt.com (Mike Van Pelt)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 01. Dec 2024, 00:17:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vig6du$1vtgk$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <robertaw-D56189.21595429112024@news.individual.net>,
Robert Woodward  <robertaw@drizzle.com> wrote:
I once spent a good deal of time studying the 2015 Hugo nominations.
While the Rabid Puppies were definitely block voting, the Sad Puppies
appeared to be different. Either there were secret puppies with their
own nominations lists (which overlapped the Sad Puppy list) or many of
the Sad Puppies were only nominating works that they had read. If the
latter was the case, while they could be accused of ungood literary
taste, was this block voting?

My understanding of the "puppies" thing was that the "Sad
Puppies" (name inspired by that "Give to the Humane Society"
ad with all the forlorn looking doggies in it) thought that
the kinds of stories they liked (and thought a bunch of
other people liked) were getting short shrift at the Hugos,
so made a list of what they considered worthy works, and said
"Here's some stuff we like that you might like as well; if so,
consider nominating it for a Hugo."

I don't see anything wrong with that, though it sure got a
lot of people upset.

A separate issue, of course, from Vox Diaboli, who glommed
onto the campaign with his "Rabid Puppies" block, which,
as you said, was definitely block voting.

The upset seemed to me to be a lot more about politics than
about quality of the works.  And conflating the original
(arguably legitimate) campaign with the (reprehensible)
block vote.

I wasn't involved in either group, being a non-attender of
Worldcon that year.

I'd kind of lost interest in the Hugos years before, anyway;
little of the kind of thing I like ever seems to get nominated,
at least, since "The Mote in God's Eye."  I note in particular
that no stories from Analog *ever* get nominated.  (Or, hardly
ever.  I can't think the last time I saw one on the list.)

--
Mike Van Pelt       |  "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
mvp at calweb.com   |   -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane
KE6BVH              |      Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston

Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 Nov 24 * Hello? Anyone here?20Robert Woodward
30 Nov 24 +- Re: Hello? Anyone here?1Dimensional Traveler
30 Nov 24 +- Re: Hello? Anyone here?1Bobbie Sellers
30 Nov 24 +* Re: Hello? Anyone here?3Lynn McGuire
30 Nov 24 i`* Re: Hello? Anyone here?2Tony Nance
1 Dec 24 i `- Re: Hello? Anyone here?1Lynn McGuire
30 Nov 24 +- Re: Hello? Anyone here?1Tony Nance
30 Nov 24 +* Re: Hello? Anyone here?3Paul S Person
30 Nov 24 i`* Re: Hello? Anyone here?2Cryptoengineer
11 Dec 24 i `- Re: Hello? Anyone here?1Paul S Person
30 Nov 24 +- Re: Hello? Anyone here?1Michael Benveniste
30 Nov 24 +* Re: Hello? Anyone here?2William Hyde
30 Nov 24 i`- Re: Hello? Anyone here?1D
1 Dec 24 +* The whole "Puppies" furor5Mike Van Pelt
1 Dec 24 i+- Re: The whole "Puppies" furor1Robert Woodward
1 Dec 24 i+* Re: The whole "Puppies" furor2James Nicoll
1 Dec 24 ii`- Re: The whole "Puppies" furor1Robert Woodward
2 Dec 24 i`- Re: The whole "Puppies" furor1Scott Dorsey
1 Dec 24 +- Re: Hello? Anyone here?1BCFD 36
2 Dec 24 `- Re: Hello? Anyone here?1Scott Dorsey

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal