Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma

Liste des Groupes 
Sujet : Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 01. Dec 2024, 04:13:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vigk9v$22pt7$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 1/12/2024 12:45 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 1 Dec 2024 00:12:31 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vif30a$1o4ji$1@dont-email.me>:
 
On 30/11/2024 10:11 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Nov 2024 21:02:25 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vienrs$1l2a8$1@dont-email.me>:
>
On 30/11/2024 5:37 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Nov 2024 14:12:42 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vidvrl$1d62d$1@dont-email.me>:
On 30/11/2024 2:27 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Nov 2024 01:15:15 +1100) it happened Bill Slowman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vici9s$13umg$1@dont-email.me>:
>
On 30/11/2024 12:00 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
<snip>

Well, we have global warming in case humans fail.
>
It's anthropogenic global warming. If we stop digging up fossil carbon
and burning it, that extra warmth will go away eventually - but it is
likely to take a few centuries.
>
Or we can dig deep enough into the ground for some heat.
But the question remains if you CAN make break even - get positive energy out
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion
endless babble about Albert E...
>
But, my solar panels work great!
>
But they rely on that big fusion reactor hanging there in the middle of
the solar system. It's been there for about 4.5 billion years. Nobody
realised that it was nuclear fusion reactor until quite recently, and
the message still doesn't seem to have got through to you.
 Oh well, and the sun will burn up eventually or so I'v read.
Not so much is known about the inner nuclear workings of the sun.
Quite a lot is known, if not by you.

Is the fusion part caused by enormous pressures from the rest of the sun?
It's temperature rather than  pressure that makes the difference.

It does not have to be break even or positive at all.
Of course it has to. Gravitational compression created the pressure and the heat that eventually started the nuclear reaction. It takes about 100,000 years for a photon from the reacting core of the sum to make it out to emerge as sunlight.

I will not even mention Le Sage (oops) and possible other theories
dark matter, what not.
That's a relief. You mostly ventilate your idiocies non-stop.
 Would be nice if we could look ahead a few thousand years to see the theories then.
Not really. We wouldn't understand them.

If humanity still exists, Dinos ?
Most species last about 10 million years. We might completely wreck the earth and kill ourselves off in the process, but we've survived several ice-age to interglacial transitions.

We are just like ants, a few neurons wanting - looking for - a theory of everything.
Just a bit bigger than ants, with rather more technology.

And yet, everything is connected...
Another one of your mindless assertions.

There is nothing you can know that is not known:
  https://www.thebeatles.com/all-you-need-love-0
There is plenty you can "know" that isn't known to other people.
You produce more nonsense than most, and most of what you think you know strikes other people as largely unoriginal nonsense.
"It does not have to be break even or positive at all."
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Nov 24 * New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma43Jan Panteltje
29 Nov 24 +* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma41Bill Sloman
29 Nov 24 i`* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma40Jan Panteltje
29 Nov 24 i +- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Liz Tuddenham
29 Nov 24 i +* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma29Jeroen Belleman
29 Nov 24 i i+* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma3john larkin
29 Nov 24 i ii`* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma2Jeroen Belleman
29 Nov 24 i ii `- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1john larkin
29 Nov 24 i i+* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma24Liz Tuddenham
29 Nov 24 i ii`* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma23Jeroen Belleman
29 Nov 24 i ii `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma22Liz Tuddenham
29 Nov 24 i ii  `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma21Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i ii   +* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma6john larkin
30 Nov 24 i ii   i`* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma5Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i ii   i `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma4john larkin
30 Nov 24 i ii   i  `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma3Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i ii   i   `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma2john larkin
1 Dec 24 i ii   i    `- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Bill Sloman
30 Nov 24 i ii   `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma14Liz Tuddenham
30 Nov 24 i ii    `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma13Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i ii     `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma12john larkin
30 Nov 24 i ii      `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma11Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i ii       `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma10john larkin
30 Nov 24 i ii        +* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma8Jeroen Belleman
1 Dec 24 i ii        i+* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma2john larkin
1 Dec 24 i ii        ii`- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Bill Sloman
1 Dec 24 i ii        i`* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma5Joe Gwinn
1 Dec 24 i ii        i +* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma2Jeroen Belleman
1 Dec 24 i ii        i i`- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Joe Gwinn
1 Dec 24 i ii        i `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma2john larkin
1 Dec 24 i ii        i  `- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Joe Gwinn
1 Dec 24 i ii        `- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Bill Sloman
30 Nov 24 i i`- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Jan Panteltje
30 Nov 24 i `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma9Bill Sloman
30 Nov 24 i  `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma8Jan Panteltje
30 Nov 24 i   `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma7Bill Sloman
30 Nov 24 i    `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma6Jan Panteltje
30 Nov 24 i     `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma5Bill Sloman
30 Nov 24 i      `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma4Jan Panteltje
1 Dec 24 i       `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma3Bill Sloman
1 Dec 24 i        `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma2Jan Panteltje
1 Dec 24 i         `- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Bill Sloman
29 Nov 24 `- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal