Sujet : Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum
De : peter (at) *nospam* pmoylan.org (Peter Moylan)
Groupes : alt.usage.english sci.physicsDate : 27. Mar 2025, 00:32:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vs22r5$2rhuk$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
On 27/03/25 09:21, Johnny LaRue wrote:
In article <08dab68206a29d41e17b3a44b6161d7c@www.novabbs.org>,
bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) wrote:
>
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:08:24 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>
On 3/12/25 16:05, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:40:27 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>
On 3/11/25 16:19, Bertitaylor wrote:
They have corrupted not just physics. And humanity too with
moral relativism, setting up wrongs as rights and rights as
wrongs.
>
The relativism you hate didn't come from Einstein. It was
there all along in Newton's physics. Strange that you
selectively hate Einstein but not Newton.
>
Quote Newton on that. Did he say that light velocity did not vary
with that of what emitted it? That is the first postulate of
Einsteinian relativity and absolutely nonsense.
>
Except that it has been measured and confirmed. Multiple times.
The light will blue-shift if the source is moving towards the
observer and will red-shift if it is moving away. But the velocity
remains the same.
Arindam has been told repeatedly where his mistakes are. He's also been
told that a violation of conservation of momentum is a violation of
Newton's laws. All of his responses show that he doesn't want to listen
or to learn.
Woof woof woof-woof
>
Actual observations versus your barking mad opinions. This is the
very difference between science and religion.
In case it's not clear: Bertie is the barking mad aspect of Arindam.
-- Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.orgNewcastle, NSW
…