Re: latching relays

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cs raspberry-pi 
Sujet : Re: latching relays
De : andrews (at) *nospam* sdf.org (Andrew Smallshaw)
Groupes : comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Date : 11. Feb 2025, 00:42:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrnvql3o2.si1.andrews@sdf.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Patched for libcanlock3) (NetBSD)
On 2025-02-10, Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> wrote:
>
Thanks for the reply. I was considering complete units (like eg url
below (*)), which differ in operation. They take a pulse on a single
logic-level input, and flip-flop between states: my query is how to
reset from a random state to the power-up state.
>
The one you reference uses either reverse polarity or a 2nd coil to flip
and flop.

[ https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B08LCTTR4Z/ ]

Those are not conventional latching relays but standard one with
an external latching circuit.  The semantics oare defiferent.
latching relays use two coildand don't need power to maintain their
state.  The page tells you all you need to know, namely the relay
is not energised when power is first applied, so conductivity is
between NCx and COMx, switching to NOx and COMx on the first pulse.

Lack of proper data sheets is one of the reasons I'm not generally
a fan of commercial building block modules like this.

--
Andrew Smallshaw
andrews@sdf.org

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Feb 25 * latching relays12Mike Scott
10 Feb 25 +* Re: latching relays8Joe
10 Feb 25 i`* Re: latching relays7Mike Scott
10 Feb 25 i +* Re: latching relays2Michael J. Mahon
11 Feb 25 i i`- Re: latching relays1Joe Beanfish
11 Feb 25 i `* Re: latching relays4Andrew Smallshaw
11 Feb 25 i  `* Re: latching relays3Mike Scott
11 Feb 25 i   `* Re: latching relays2David Higton
12 Feb 25 i    `- Re: latching relays1Joe
10 Feb 25 `* Re: latching relays3David Higton
14 Feb 25  `* Re: latching relays2Joe
15 Feb 25   `- Re: latching relays1David Higton

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal