sci.physics.relativity

Liste des GroupesPages :123456789101112131415161718
Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Oct02:55 * I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²18rhertz
3 Oct04:19 +* Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²11Ross Finlayson
3 Oct06:18 i`* Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²10rhertz
3 Oct22:23 i +- Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²1Paul.B.Andersen
5 Oct19:32 i `* Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²8rhertz
5 Oct20:42 i  +- Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²1Richard Hachel
5 Oct22:11 i  `* Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²6Paul.B.Andersen
5 Oct22:39 i   +* Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²3rhertz
5 Oct23:04 i   i`* Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²2Paul.B.Andersen
5 Oct23:51 i   i `- Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²1rhertz
5 Oct22:52 i   +- Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²1Paul.B.Andersen
5 Oct22:51 i   `- Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²1Maciej Wozniak
4 Oct13:44 +* Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²5Paul.B.Andersen
4 Oct15:34 i`* Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²4rhertz
4 Oct20:17 i `* Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²3Paul.B.Andersen
5 Oct00:16 i  `* Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²2rhertz
5 Oct15:23 i   `- Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²1Paul.B.Andersen
5 Oct10:10 `- Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time:1Thomas Heger
5 Oct21:37 o Re: Spinors et interprétation physique de l'é1Richard Hachel
3 Oct12:10 * A discussion of 'Tachyons, the 4-momentum ...'11gharnagel
3 Oct13:25 +- Re: A discussion of 'Tachyons, the 4-momentum ...'1Maciej Wozniak
3 Oct14:36 +* Re: A discussion of 'Tachyons, the 4-momentum ...'7Richard Hachel
3 Oct19:30 i`* Re: A discussion of 'Tachyons, the 4-momentum ...'6gharnagel
3 Oct20:09 i `* Re: A discussion of 'Tachyons, the 4-momentum ...'5Richard Hachel
4 Oct13:28 i  `* Re: A discussion of 'Tachyons, the 4-momentum ...'4gharnagel
4 Oct13:55 i   `* Re: A discussion of 'Tachyons, the 4-momentum ...'3Richard Hachel
4 Oct21:36 i    `* Re: A discussion of 'Tachyons, the 4-momentum ...'2gharnagel
4 Oct22:01 i     `- Re: A discussion of 'Tachyons, the 4-momentum ...'1Richard Hachel
5 Oct20:35 `* Re: A discussion of 'Tachyons, the 4-momentum ...'2gharnagel
5 Oct20:57  `- Re: A discussion of 'Tachyons, the 4-momentum ...'1Richard Hachel
5 Oct07:08 * The Shit is a religion2Maciej Wozniak
5 Oct18:30 `- Re: The Shit is a religion1Maciej Wozniak
25 Sep 24 * Oh my God!65Richard Hachel
25 Sep 24 +* Re: Oh my God!60Athel Cornish-Bowden
25 Sep 24 i+* Re: Oh my God!29gharnagel
25 Sep 24 ii+* Re: Oh my God!24Athel Cornish-Bowden
26 Sep 24 iii+* Re: Oh my God!22gharnagel
26 Sep 24 iiii`* Re: Oh my God!21Athel Cornish-Bowden
26 Sep 24 iiii +- Re: Oh my God!1Richard Hachel
27 Sep 24 iiii `* Re: Oh my God!19gharnagel
27 Sep 24 iiii  `* Re: Oh my God!18ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Sep 24 iiii   `* Re: Oh my God!17gharnagel
27 Sep 24 iiii    +* Re: Oh my God!8ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Sep 24 iiii    i`* Re: Oh my God!7gharnagel
28 Sep 24 iiii    i `* Re: Oh my God!6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
28 Sep 24 iiii    i  +- Re: Oh my God!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
28 Sep 24 iiii    i  `* Re: Oh my God!4gharnagel
28 Sep 24 iiii    i   `* Re: Oh my God!3gharnagel
28 Sep 24 iiii    i    `* Re: Oh my God!2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
28 Sep22:28 iiii    i     `- Re: Oh my God!1gharnagel
27 Sep 24 iiii    `* Re: Oh my God!8Richard Hachel
27 Sep 24 iiii     `* Re: Oh my God!7ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Sep 24 iiii      `* Re: Oh my God!6Richard Hachel
27 Sep 24 iiii       `* Re: Oh my God!5gharnagel
28 Sep 24 iiii        `* Re: Oh my God!4Richard Hachel
28 Sep 24 iiii         `* Re: Oh my God!3gharnagel
28 Sep 24 iiii          `* Re: Oh my God!2Richard Hachel
28 Sep 24 iiii           `- Re: Oh my God!1gharnagel
26 Sep 24 iii`- Re: Oh my God!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
26 Sep 24 ii+* Re: Oh my God!2gharnagel
26 Sep 24 iii`- Re: Oh my God!1Maciej Wozniak
28 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Oh my God!2J. J. Lodder
28 Sep 24 ii `- Re: Oh my God!1Richard Hachel
26 Sep 24 i`* Re: Oh my God!30Thomas Heger
26 Sep 24 i `* Re: Oh my God!29Richard Hachel
28 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Oh my God!28Thomas Heger
28 Sep23:26 i   `* Re: Oh my God!27Richard Hachel
29 Sep11:37 i    +* Re: Oh my God!2Mikko
29 Sep15:56 i    i`- Re: Oh my God!1Richard Hachel
29 Sep22:53 i    `* Re: Oh my God!24gharnagel
1 Oct01:48 i     `* Re: Oh my God!23ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
1 Oct03:13 i      +- Re: Oh my God!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
1 Oct15:51 i      `* Re: Oh my God!21gharnagel
1 Oct17:55 i       `* Re: Oh my God!20ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
1 Oct20:47 i        `* Re: Oh my God!19gharnagel
1 Oct21:11 i         +* Re: Oh my God!7Richard Hachel
1 Oct23:56 i         i`* Re: Oh my God!6Python
2 Oct00:13 i         i +* Re: Oh my God!4Richard Hachel
2 Oct00:25 i         i i`* Re: Oh my God!3Python
2 Oct00:34 i         i i +- Re: Oh my God!1Python
2 Oct06:55 i         i i `- Re: Oh my God!1Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct06:53 i         i `- Re: Oh my God!1Maciej Wozniak
1 Oct21:24 i         `* Re: Oh my God!11ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
2 Oct00:18 i          `* Re: Oh my God!10gharnagel
3 Oct00:26 i           `* Re: Oh my God!9ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
3 Oct04:42 i            +- Re: Oh my God!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
3 Oct05:04 i            `* Re: Oh my God!7gharnagel
3 Oct10:00 i             +- Re: Oh my God!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
3 Oct11:17 i             `* Re: Oh my God!5gharnagel
3 Oct15:39 i              `* Re: Oh my God!4gharnagel
3 Oct19:41 i               `* Re: Oh my God!3gharnagel
4 Oct15:26 i                `* Re: Oh my God!2gharnagel
5 Oct14:59 i                 `- Re: Oh my God!1gharnagel
26 Sep 24 `* Re: Oh my God!4Mikko
26 Sep 24  `* Re: Oh my God!3Richard Hachel
29 Sep11:34   `* Re: Oh my God!2Mikko
29 Sep19:28    `- Re: Oh my God!1Athel Cornish-Bowden
5 Oct12:27 o Have you noticed?1Richard Hachel
1 Oct00:52 * the notion of relativity of simultaneity34Richard Hachel
1 Oct02:34 `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity33Python
1 Oct08:52  +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity29Thomas Heger
1 Oct10:11  i+- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
1 Oct14:36  i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity27Richard Hachel
1 Oct14:54  i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity26Python
1 Oct15:23  i  +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Richard Hachel
1 Oct15:25  i  i`- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
2 Oct20:54  i  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity23Thomas Heger
2 Oct21:00  i   +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity19Python
2 Oct21:21  i   i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct21:26  i   ii`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
2 Oct21:44  i   ii `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct21:59  i   i+- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
3 Oct09:09  i   i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity14Thomas Heger
3 Oct14:17  i   i +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity4Python
3 Oct14:26  i   i i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Richard Hachel
3 Oct14:39  i   i i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
3 Oct15:05  i   i i  `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
3 Oct14:41  i   i +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity5Richard Hachel
3 Oct14:44  i   i i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
3 Oct15:07  i   i ii`- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
5 Oct09:36  i   i i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Thomas Heger
5 Oct11:54  i   i i `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
3 Oct14:49  i   i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity4Richard Hachel
3 Oct14:53  i   i  +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
5 Oct09:52  i   i  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Thomas Heger
5 Oct12:14  i   i   `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
2 Oct22:07  i   `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Richard Hachel
3 Oct09:12  i    `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Thomas Heger
3 Oct15:03  i     `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
1 Oct14:22  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Richard Hachel
1 Oct14:45   +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
2 Oct09:07   `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Mikko
25 Sep 24 * Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!30rhertz
25 Sep 24 +* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!22Paul.B.Andersen
25 Sep 24 i+* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!19rhertz
25 Sep 24 ii+* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!16rhertz
25 Sep 24 iii`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!15rhertz
26 Sep 24 iii +* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!7rhertz
26 Sep 24 iii i`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Sep 24 iii i +* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Sep 24 iii i i`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!3rhertz
27 Sep 24 iii i i `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
28 Sep 24 iii i i  `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
1 Oct23:53 iii i `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1Maciej Wozniak
26 Sep 24 iii `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!7Paul.B.Andersen
26 Sep 24 iii  `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!6rhertz
26 Sep 24 iii   `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!5Paul.B.Andersen
27 Sep 24 iii    `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!4rhertz
27 Sep 24 iii     `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!3rhertz
28 Sep 24 iii      `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!2Paul.B.Andersen
29 Sep00:58 iii       `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1rhertz
25 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!2Paul.B.Andersen
25 Sep 24 ii `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1rhertz
25 Sep 24 i+- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1Richard Hachel
25 Sep 24 i`- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1Richard Hachel
26 Sep 24 +- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1bertietaylor
30 Sep23:37 `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!6J. J. Lodder
1 Oct01:16  `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!5rhertz
1 Oct13:27   +* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!3Paul.B.Andersen
1 Oct23:57   i`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!2Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct00:21   i `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1Richard Hachel
5 Oct10:58   `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1J. J. Lodder
29 Sep15:54 * The physics aphorisms of Arindam51bertietaylor
29 Sep17:43 +- Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam1Jim Pennino
1 Oct05:15 `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam49bertietaylor
1 Oct05:43  +- Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam1Jim Pennino
1 Oct11:06  `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam47bertietaylor
1 Oct15:22   +* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam10Jim Pennino
1 Oct16:11   i`* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam9bertietaylor
1 Oct16:20   i `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam8Jim Pennino
2 Oct01:22   i  `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam7bertietaylor
2 Oct02:48   i   `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam6Jim Pennino
2 Oct04:57   i    `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam5bertietaylor
2 Oct05:32   i     `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam4Jim Pennino
2 Oct06:43   i      `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam3bertietaylor
2 Oct14:45   i       `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam2Jim Pennino
2 Oct22:33   i        `- Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam1bertietaylor
2 Oct01:19   `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam36bertietaylor
2 Oct02:51    `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam35Jim Pennino
2 Oct06:57     `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam34Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct22:30      +* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam10bertietaylor
2 Oct23:31      i`* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam9Jim Pennino
3 Oct00:35      i `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam8bertietaylor
3 Oct01:02      i  `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam7Jim Pennino
3 Oct02:52      i   `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam6bertietaylor
3 Oct16:30      i    `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam5Jim Pennino
3 Oct23:09      i     `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam4bertietaylor
3 Oct23:22      i      `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam3Jim Pennino
4 Oct02:32      i       `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam2bertietaylor
4 Oct02:57      i        `- Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam1Jim Pennino
2 Oct23:30      `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam23Jim Pennino
2 Oct23:38       +* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam12bertietaylor
3 Oct01:03       i`* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam11Jim Pennino
3 Oct23:23       i `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam10bertietaylor
3 Oct23:43       i  `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam9Jim Pennino
4 Oct00:59       i   `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam8bertietaylor
4 Oct01:10       i    +- Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam1bertietaylor
4 Oct02:59       i    `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam6Jim Pennino
4 Oct03:15       i     `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam5bertietaylor
4 Oct05:52       i      `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam4Jim Pennino
4 Oct06:14       i       +* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam2bertietaylor
4 Oct16:07       i       i`- Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam1Jim Pennino
4 Oct07:32       i       `- Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam1Maciej Wozniak
3 Oct07:31       `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam10Maciej Wozniak
3 Oct16:33        `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam9Jim Pennino
3 Oct17:34         `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam8Maciej Wozniak
3 Oct18:57          `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam7Jim Pennino
3 Oct19:54           `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam6Maciej Wozniak
3 Oct20:26            `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam5Jim Pennino
3 Oct21:01             `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam4Jim Pennino
3 Oct22:14              `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam3Maciej Wozniak
3 Oct22:54               `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam2Jim Pennino
4 Oct01:14                `- Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam1bertietaylor
3 Oct20:13 * Definition : relativistic (or not) hyperplane2Richard Hachel
4 Oct10:52 `- Re: Definition : relativistic (or not) hyperplane1Mikko
17 Sep 24 * vis-viva and vis-motrix33Ross Finlayson
17 Sep 24 +* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix27J. J. Lodder
17 Sep 24 i`* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix26Ross Finlayson
22 Sep 24 i `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix25Ross Finlayson
22 Sep 24 i  `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix24Ross Finlayson
25 Sep 24 i   +* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix20Ross Finlayson
26 Sep 24 i   i`* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix19Ross Finlayson
26 Sep 24 i   i `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix18Ross Finlayson
26 Sep 24 i   i  +- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
28 Sep 24 i   i  +* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix3Ross Finlayson
28 Sep 24 i   i  i`* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix2Ross Finlayson
28 Sep 24 i   i  i `- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
28 Sep 24 i   i  `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix13Thomas Heger
28 Sep23:57 i   i   `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix12Ross Finlayson
30 Sep03:13 i   i    +- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
30 Sep07:20 i   i    `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix10Thomas Heger
30 Sep20:55 i   i     `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix9Ross Finlayson
1 Oct08:48 i   i      `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix8Thomas Heger
1 Oct15:27 i   i       +* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix4Richard Hachel
1 Oct18:53 i   i       i+- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
2 Oct20:58 i   i       i`* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix2Thomas Heger
3 Oct04:22 i   i       i `- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
2 Oct02:49 i   i       `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix3Ross Finlayson
3 Oct22:51 i   i        `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix2Ross Finlayson
4 Oct04:46 i   i         `- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
25 Sep 24 i   `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix3J. J. Lodder
26 Sep 24 i    `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix2Ross Finlayson
26 Sep 24 i     `- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1J. J. Lodder
26 Sep 24 `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix5bertietaylor
26 Sep 24  `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix4Ross Finlayson
26 Sep 24   +- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1bertietaylor
26 Sep 24   `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix2bertietaylor
27 Sep 24    `- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
3 Oct22:51 o Proper time and coordinate time1Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct11:25 * A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru14Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal