comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Jun 25     i i     `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem7Mikko
8 Jun 25     i i      `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem6olcott
8 Jun 25     i i       +- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
8 Jun 25     i i       +- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1dbush
10 Jun 25     i i       `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem3Mikko
10 Jun 25     i i        `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem2olcott
10 Jun 25     i i         `- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
2 Jun 25     i +* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem3Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 25     i i`* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem2olcott
3 Jun 25     i i `- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 25     i `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem6Richard Damon
2 Jun 25     i  `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem5olcott
2 Jun 25     i   +* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem3Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 25     i   i`* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem2olcott
3 Jun 25     i   i `- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Fred. Zwarts
3 Jun 25     i   `- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
2 Jun 25     `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem26Mikko
2 Jun 25      `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem25olcott
3 Jun 25       `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem24Mikko
3 Jun 25        +* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem21olcott
3 Jun 25        i+* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem7dbush
3 Jun 25        ii`* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem6olcott
4 Jun 25        ii +* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem4dbush
4 Jun 25        ii i`* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem3olcott
4 Jun 25        ii i +- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1dbush
4 Jun 25        ii i `- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
4 Jun 25        ii `- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
4 Jun 25        i+- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
4 Jun 25        i`* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem12Mikko
4 Jun 25        i `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem11olcott
8 Jun 25        i  `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem10Mikko
8 Jun 25        i   `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem9olcott
8 Jun 25        i    +- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
10 Jun 25        i    `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem7Mikko
10 Jun 25        i     `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem6olcott
10 Jun 25        i      +- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
11 Jun 25        i      `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem4Mikko
11 Jun 25        i       `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem3olcott
11 Jun 25        i        +- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
12 Jun 25        i        `- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Mikko
3 Jun 25        `* Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem2olcott
4 Jun 25         `- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
12 Jun 25 * HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT52olcott
13 Jun 25 +* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT17Fred. Zwarts
13 Jun 25 i`* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT16olcott
13 Jun 25 i +* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT14Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 i i`* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT13olcott
13 Jun 25 i i `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT12Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 i i  `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT11olcott
13 Jun 25 i i   `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT10Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 i i    `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT9olcott
14 Jun 25 i i     `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT8Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 i i      `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT7olcott
14 Jun 25 i i       `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT6Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 i i        `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT5olcott
14 Jun 25 i i         +- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT1Fred. Zwarts
14 Jun 25 i i         `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT3Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 i i          `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT2olcott
14 Jun 25 i i           `- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT1Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 i `- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT1Fred. Zwarts
13 Jun 25 `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT34Mikko
13 Jun 25  +* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT27olcott
14 Jun 25  i+* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT25Fred. Zwarts
14 Jun 25  ii`* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT24olcott
15 Jun 25  ii +* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT20Fred. Zwarts
15 Jun 25  ii i`* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++19olcott
16 Jun 25  ii i `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++18Mikko
16 Jun 25  ii i  `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++17olcott
17 Jun 25  ii i   +* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++8Richard Damon
17 Jun 25  ii i   i`* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++7olcott
18 Jun 25  ii i   i `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++6Richard Damon
18 Jun 25  ii i   i  `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++5olcott
18 Jun 25  ii i   i   +* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++3joes
18 Jun 25  ii i   i   i`* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++2olcott
19 Jun 25  ii i   i   i `- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1Richard Damon
19 Jun 25  ii i   i   `- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1Richard Damon
17 Jun 25  ii i   `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++8Mikko
17 Jun 25  ii i    `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++7olcott
18 Jun 25  ii i     `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++6Mikko
18 Jun 25  ii i      `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++5olcott
19 Jun 25  ii i       +- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1Richard Damon
19 Jun 25  ii i       `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++3Mikko
19 Jun 25  ii i        `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++2olcott
20 Jun 25  ii i         `- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1Richard Damon
15 Jun 25  ii `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT3Mikko
15 Jun 25  ii  `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT2olcott
16 Jun 25  ii   `- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT1Mikko
14 Jun 25  i`- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT1Mikko
14 Jun 25  `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++6olcott
14 Jun 25   +- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1Richard Damon
15 Jun 25   `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++4Mikko
15 Jun 25    `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++3olcott
15 Jun 25     +- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1Richard Damon
16 Jun 25     `- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1Mikko
7 Jun 25 * The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence79olcott
7 Jun 25 +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence34dbush
7 Jun 25 i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence33olcott
7 Jun 25 i +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence31dbush
7 Jun 25 i i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence30olcott
7 Jun 25 i i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence29dbush
7 Jun 25 i i  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence28olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence26dbush
7 Jun 25 i i   i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence25olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence24dbush
7 Jun 25 i i   i  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence23olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   i   `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence22dbush
7 Jun 25 i i   i    `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence21olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   i     `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence20dbush
7 Jun 25 i i   i      `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence19olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   i       +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence17dbush
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence16olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence14dbush
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence13olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence12dbush
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence11olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i   `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence10dbush
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i    `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence9olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i     +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence5dbush
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i     i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i     i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence3dbush
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i     i  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i     i   `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1dbush
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i     `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence3joes
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i      `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   i       i i       `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1joes
8 Jun 25 i i   i       i `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
8 Jun 25 i i   i       `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
8 Jun 25 i i   `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
7 Jun 25 i `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
7 Jun 25 +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence15olcott
7 Jun 25 i+* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence13wij
7 Jun 25 ii`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence12olcott
7 Jun 25 ii +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence10wij
7 Jun 25 ii i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence9olcott
7 Jun 25 ii i +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence5joes
7 Jun 25 ii i i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4olcott
7 Jun 25 ii i i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence3joes
7 Jun 25 ii i i  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2olcott
7 Jun 25 ii i i   `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1joes
7 Jun 25 ii i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence3wij
7 Jun 25 ii i  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2olcott
7 Jun 25 ii i   `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1wij
8 Jun 25 ii `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
8 Jun 25 i`- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
7 Jun 25 +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4Richard Damon
8 Jun 25 i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence3Richard Damon
8 Jun 25 i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2Richard Damon
9 Jun 25 i  `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
8 Jun 25 +- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Mikko
8 Jun 25 +- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Fred. Zwarts
11 Jun 25 +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence19anthk
12 Jun 25 i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence18olcott
12 Jun 25 i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence17Richard Damon
12 Jun 25 i  +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence14olcott
12 Jun 25 i  i+* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2Fred. Zwarts
12 Jun 25 i  ii`- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence --- VERIFIED FACTS1olcott
12 Jun 25 i  i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence11Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 i  i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence10Mikko
13 Jun 25 i  i  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence9olcott
15 Jun 25 i  i   `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence8Mikko
15 Jun 25 i  i    `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence7olcott
15 Jun 25 i  i     +- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 i  i     `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence5Mikko
16 Jun 25 i  i      `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4olcott
17 Jun 25 i  i       `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence3Mikko
17 Jun 25 i  i        `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2olcott
18 Jun 25 i  i         `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Mikko
12 Jun 25 i  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence --- VERIFIED FACTS2olcott
12 Jun 25 i   `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence --- VERIFIED FACTS1Richard Damon
18 Jun 25 `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4Mikko
18 Jun 25  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence3olcott
19 Jun 25   +- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
19 Jun 25   `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Mikko
9 Jun 25 * Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point176olcott
9 Jun 25 +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point123dbush
9 Jun 25 i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point122olcott
9 Jun 25 i +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point119dbush
9 Jun 25 i i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point118olcott
9 Jun 25 i i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point117dbush
9 Jun 25 i i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point116olcott
9 Jun 25 i i   +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point53Fred. Zwarts
9 Jun 25 i i   i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point52olcott
10 Jun 25 i i   i +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point43Richard Damon
10 Jun 25 i i   i i+* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point39olcott
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii+* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3Richard Damon
10 Jun 25 i i   i iii`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
10 Jun 25 i i   i iii `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point35Mikko
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point23olcott
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii i+- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
11 Jun 25 i i   i ii i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point21Mikko
11 Jun 25 i i   i ii i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point20olcott
11 Jun 25 i i   i ii i  +- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 i i   i ii i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point18Mikko
14 Jun 25 i i   i ii i   `* The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++17olcott
15 Jun 25 i i   i ii i    +* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++10Fred. Zwarts
15 Jun 25 i i   i ii i    i+* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++7olcott
15 Jun 25 i i   i ii i    ii+- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 i i   i ii i    ii+- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25 i i   i ii i    ii`* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++4Mikko
16 Jun 25 i i   i ii i    ii `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++3olcott
17 Jun 25 i i   i ii i    ii  +- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Richard Damon
17 Jun 25 i i   i ii i    ii  `- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Mikko
15 Jun 25 i i   i ii i    i`* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++2olcott
16 Jun 25 i i   i ii i    i `- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Fred. Zwarts
15 Jun 25 i i   i ii i    `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++6Mikko
15 Jun 25 i i   i ii i     `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++5olcott
16 Jun 25 i i   i ii i      +- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25 i i   i ii i      `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++3Mikko
16 Jun 25 i i   i ii i       `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++2olcott
17 Jun 25 i i   i ii i        `- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Richard Damon
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point11Mike Terry
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii  `* Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)10olcott
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii   +* Re: Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)8Mike Terry
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii   i+* Re: Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)4olcott
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii   ii`* Re: Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)3Richard Damon
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii   ii `* Re: Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)2olcott
11 Jun 25 i i   i ii   ii  `- Re: Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)1Richard Damon
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii   i`* Re: Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)3Mike Terry
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii   i `* Re: Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)2olcott
11 Jun 25 i i   i ii   i  `- Re: Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)1Fred. Zwarts
10 Jun 25 i i   i ii   `- Re: Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)1Richard Damon
10 Jun 25 i i   i i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3Richard Heathfield
10 Jun 25 i i   i i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
10 Jun 25 i i   i i  `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
10 Jun 25 i i   i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point8Fred. Zwarts
10 Jun 25 i i   i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point7olcott
10 Jun 25 i i   i   +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3joes
10 Jun 25 i i   i   i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
11 Jun 25 i i   i   i `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
11 Jun 25 i i   i   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3Fred. Zwarts
11 Jun 25 i i   i    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
11 Jun 25 i i   i     `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
9 Jun 25 i i   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point62dbush
9 Jun 25 i i    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point61olcott
9 Jun 25 i i     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point60dbush
9 Jun 25 i i      `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point59olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point55dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point54olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point53dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point51olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point50dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point48olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i i+* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point44dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point43olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii +- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point41dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point40olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point39dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point38olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal