sci.math

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Apr 25  `* Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify12Physfitfreak
15 Apr 25   `* Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify11Ross Finlayson
15 Apr 25    +* Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify5Physfitfreak
15 Apr 25    i`* Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify4Physfitfreak
15 Apr 25    i +* Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify2Ross Finlayson
15 Apr 25    i i`- Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify1Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25    i `- Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify1Physfitfreak
16 Apr 25    `* Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify5Physfitfreak
16 Apr 25     `* Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify4Ross Finlayson
18 Apr 25      `* Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify3Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25       `* Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify2Bertitaylor
19 Apr 25        `- Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify1Bertitaylor
12 Mar 25 * The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series451WM
12 Mar 25 `* Re: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series450Alan Mackenzie
12 Mar 25  `* Re: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series449WM
12 Mar 25   `* The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series]448Alan Mackenzie
12 Mar 25    +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series]444WM
12 Mar 25    i+* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"414Alan Mackenzie
12 Mar 25    ii`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"413WM
12 Mar 25    ii `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"412Alan Mackenzie
12 Mar 25    ii  +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"6Moebius
13 Mar 25    ii  i+- Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"1WM
13 Mar 25    ii  i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"4Alan Mackenzie
13 Mar 25    ii  i `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"3Moebius
13 Mar 25    ii  i  `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"2WM
13 Mar 25    ii  i   `- Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"1joes
13 Mar 25    ii  +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"401WM
13 Mar 25    ii  i+* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"399Alan Mackenzie
13 Mar 25    ii  ii+* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"397WM
13 Mar 25    ii  iii+* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"3joes
13 Mar 25    ii  iiii`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"2WM
14 Mar 25    ii  iiii `- Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"1joes
13 Mar 25    ii  iii`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"393Alan Mackenzie
14 Mar 25    ii  iii `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"392WM
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"7FromTheRafters
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"6WM
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  i `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"5FromTheRafters
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  i  `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"4WM
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i   `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"3FromTheRafters
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i    +- Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" (thread too long, nothing in it)1Ross Finlayson
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i    `- Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"1WM
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"383Alan Mackenzie
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"382WM
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  i +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"380Alan Mackenzie
14 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"379WM
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"371Alan Mackenzie
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"370WM
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"4joes
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"3WM
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"2joes
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i  `- Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"1WM
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"362Alan Mackenzie
15 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"361WM
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"356Alan Mackenzie
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"355WM
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i +* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"268Jim Burns
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i`* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"267WM
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"266Jim Burns
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i  `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"265WM
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i   `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"264Jim Burns
16 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i    `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"263WM
17 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i     `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"262Jim Burns
17 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i      `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"261WM
17 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i       `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"260Jim Burns
17 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i        `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"259WM
17 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i         `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"258Jim Burns
18 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i          `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"257WM
18 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i           `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"256Jim Burns
18 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i            `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"255WM
19 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i             `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"254Jim Burns
19 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i              `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"253WM
19 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i               `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"252Jim Burns
20 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"251WM
20 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                 `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"250Jim Burns
20 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                  `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"249WM
20 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                   `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"248Jim Burns
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                    `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"247WM
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                     `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"246Jim Burns
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                      `* Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"245WM
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       +* The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]183Alan Mackenzie
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]40Moebius
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       ii+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]37Moebius
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iiii`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 1034Alan Mackenzie
21 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 1032Moebius
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii i+- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101Ross Finlayson
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 1029Ralf Bader
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 1028Moebius
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 102Moebius
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101Moebius
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 1025Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 1024Jim Burns
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)23Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)19Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)18Jim Burns
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)11Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)10Jim Burns
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)9Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i  +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)3Jim Burns
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i  i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)2Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i  i `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)1Jim Burns
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)5Jim Burns
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)4Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)3Jim Burns
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i     `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)2Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i i      `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)1Jim Burns
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)6Chris M. Thomasson
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)5Jim Burns
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)4FromTheRafters
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i    +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)1Jim Burns
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)2Ross Finlayson
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    i     `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)1Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)3Jim Burns
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii     `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)2Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii ii      `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories)1Jim Burns
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101WM
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       iii `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101WM
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       ii`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2WM
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       ii `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1joes
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]142WM
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]107joes
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]106WM
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]105Alan Mackenzie
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]11Moebius
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]10Alan Mackenzie
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]8WM
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]7Alan Mackenzie
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i   +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i   i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i   +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3WM
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Alan Mackenzie
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  i     `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]92WM
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]90Alan Mackenzie
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]89WM
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]88Alan Mackenzie
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i  +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3Moebius
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i  i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i  i `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]84WM
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]83Alan Mackenzie
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]5Moebius
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]4Moebius
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    i +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    i i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    i `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]76WM
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]52joes
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]51WM
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]42Alan Mackenzie
26 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]15Moebius
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]14WM
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3joes
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2WM
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii i `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1joes
28 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]10Moebius
28 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
28 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]6WM
28 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2joes
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  ii`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
28 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  ii`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
28 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Jim Burns
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i ii  `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]26WM
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101joes
28 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]24Alan Mackenzie
29 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i  +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]22WM
3 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]21Alan Mackenzie
3 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]17WM
4 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]7Alan Mackenzie
4 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    ii+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]5WM
4 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    iii`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]4FromTheRafters
5 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    iii `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3WM
5 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    iii  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2FromTheRafters
5 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    iii   `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
5 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    ii`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
13 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]9joes
13 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    i +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3WM
13 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    i i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2FromTheRafters
13 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    i i `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
13 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]5WM
14 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]4joes
14 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3WM
14 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    i    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2joes
14 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    i     `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
4 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3Moebius
4 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i     +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
4 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i i     `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]8joes
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]7WM
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i   +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 104joes
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i   i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 103WM
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i   i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 102joes
4 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i   i  `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101Ross Finlayson
28 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     i    `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i     `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]23Alan Mackenzie
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]9Moebius
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]8Alan Mackenzie
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1FromTheRafters
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]5Jim Burns
28 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i i+* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Alan Mackenzie
29 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i ii`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i i+- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
28 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      i `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i      `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]13WM
27 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i       +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101joes
28 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i       +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Moebius
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i       i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
28 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i       `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]9Alan Mackenzie
2 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i        `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]8WM
3 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i         `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]7Alan Mackenzie
3 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i          +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
3 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i          `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]5WM
13 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i           `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]4joes
13 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i            `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3WM
14 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i             `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2joes
14 Apr 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   i              `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1WM
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i i   `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1joes
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]34Alan Mackenzie
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]14Moebius
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]13Moebius
22 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]10Alan Mackenzie
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]9WM
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]8Alan Mackenzie
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i i  +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (law(s) of large numbers)1Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]6WM
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i i   `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]5Alan Mackenzie
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i i    +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i i    +- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i i    `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2WM
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i i     `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Alan Mackenzie
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2WM
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  i  `- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 101joes
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]19WM
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i   +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]2Python
23 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i   i`- Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]1Moebius
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i   +* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]6joes
24 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i   i`* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]5WM
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i   i `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]4joes
25 Mar 25    ii  iii  i i i i i i                       i   i  `* Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]3WM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal