Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
13 Mar 25 |          Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 399 | | Alan Mackenzie |
13 Mar 25 |           Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 397 | | WM |
13 Mar 25 |            Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | joes |
13 Mar 25 |             Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 2 | | WM |
14 Mar 25 |              Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
13 Mar 25 |            Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 393 | | Alan Mackenzie |
14 Mar 25 |             Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 392 | | WM |
14 Mar 25 |              Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 7 | | FromTheRafters |
14 Mar 25 |               Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 6 | | WM |
14 Mar 25 |                Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 5 | | FromTheRafters |
14 Mar 25 |                 Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | WM |
15 Mar 25 |                  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | FromTheRafters |
15 Mar 25 |                   Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" (thread too long, nothing in it) | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
15 Mar 25 |                   Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | WM |
14 Mar 25 |              Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 383 | | Alan Mackenzie |
14 Mar 25 |               Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 382 | | WM |
14 Mar 25 |                Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 380 | | Alan Mackenzie |
14 Mar 25 |                 Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 379 | | WM |
15 Mar 25 |                  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 371 | | Alan Mackenzie |
15 Mar 25 |                   Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 370 | | WM |
15 Mar 25 |                    Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | joes |
15 Mar 25 |                     Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | WM |
15 Mar 25 |                      Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 2 | | joes |
15 Mar 25 |                       Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | WM |
15 Mar 25 |                    Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 362 | | Alan Mackenzie |
15 Mar 25 |                     Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 361 | | WM |
16 Mar 25 |                      Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 356 | | Alan Mackenzie |
16 Mar 25 |                       Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 355 | | WM |
16 Mar 25 |                        Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 268 | | Jim Burns |
16 Mar 25 |                         Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 267 | | WM |
16 Mar 25 |                          Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 266 | | Jim Burns |
16 Mar 25 |                           Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 265 | | WM |
16 Mar 25 |                            Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 264 | | Jim Burns |
16 Mar 25 |                             Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 263 | | WM |
17 Mar 25 |                              Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 262 | | Jim Burns |
17 Mar 25 |                               Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 261 | | WM |
17 Mar 25 |                                Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 260 | | Jim Burns |
17 Mar 25 |                                 Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 259 | | WM |
17 Mar 25 |                                  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 258 | | Jim Burns |
18 Mar 25 |                                   Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 257 | | WM |
18 Mar 25 |                                    Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 256 | | Jim Burns |
18 Mar 25 |                                     Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 255 | | WM |
19 Mar 25 |                                      Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 254 | | Jim Burns |
19 Mar 25 |                                       Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 253 | | WM |
19 Mar 25 |                                        Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 252 | | Jim Burns |
20 Mar 25 |                                         Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 251 | | WM |
20 Mar 25 |                                          Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 250 | | Jim Burns |
20 Mar 25 |                                           Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 249 | | WM |
20 Mar 25 |                                            Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 248 | | Jim Burns |
21 Mar 25 |                                             Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 247 | | WM |
21 Mar 25 |                                              Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 246 | | Jim Burns |
21 Mar 25 |                                               Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 245 | | WM |
21 Mar 25 |                                                The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 183 | | Alan Mackenzie |
21 Mar 25 |                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 40 | | Moebius |
21 Mar 25 |                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 37 | | Moebius |
21 Mar 25 |                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
21 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
21 Mar 25 |                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 34 | | Alan Mackenzie |
21 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 32 | | Moebius |
22 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
22 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 29 | | Ralf Bader |
22 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 28 | | Moebius |
22 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 2 | | Moebius |
22 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | Moebius |
23 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 25 | | Ross Finlayson |
23 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 24 | | Jim Burns |
23 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 23 | | Ross Finlayson |
24 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 19 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
24 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 18 | | Jim Burns |
24 Mar 25 |                                                            Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 11 | | Ross Finlayson |
24 Mar 25 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 10 | | Jim Burns |
25 Mar 25 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 9 | | Ross Finlayson |
25 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 3 | | Jim Burns |
25 Mar 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
25 Mar 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
25 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 5 | | Jim Burns |
25 Mar 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 4 | | Ross Finlayson |
25 Mar 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 3 | | Jim Burns |
25 Mar 25 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
25 Mar 25 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
26 Mar 25 |                                                            Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 6 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
27 Mar 25 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 5 | | Jim Burns |
27 Mar 25 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 4 | | FromTheRafters |
27 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
27 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
27 Mar 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
24 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 3 | | Jim Burns |
24 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
24 Mar 25 |                                                            Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
22 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | WM |
22 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | WM |
22 Mar 25 |                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | WM |
22 Mar 25 |                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | joes |
22 Mar 25 |                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 142 | | WM |
22 Mar 25 |                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 107 | | joes |
23 Mar 25 |                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 106 | | WM |
23 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 105 | | Alan Mackenzie |
23 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 11 | | Moebius |
23 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 10 | | Alan Mackenzie |
24 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
24 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 8 | | WM |
24 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 7 | | Alan Mackenzie |
24 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
24 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
25 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Alan Mackenzie |
25 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
23 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
24 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 92 | | WM |
24 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 90 | | Alan Mackenzie |
25 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 89 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 88 | | Alan Mackenzie |
25 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | Moebius |
25 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
25 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 84 | | WM |
26 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 83 | | Alan Mackenzie |
26 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
26 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 5 | | Moebius |
26 Mar 25 |                                                            Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 4 | | Moebius |
26 Mar 25 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
26 Mar 25 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
26 Mar 25 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
26 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 76 | | WM |
26 Mar 25 |                                                            Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 52 | | joes |
26 Mar 25 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 51 | | WM |
26 Mar 25 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 42 | | Alan Mackenzie |
26 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 15 | | Moebius |
27 Mar 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 14 | | WM |
27 Mar 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | joes |
2 Apr 25 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | WM |
2 Apr 25 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | joes |
28 Mar 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 10 | | Moebius |
28 Mar 25 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
2 Apr 25 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
28 Mar 25 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 6 | | WM |
28 Mar 25 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | joes |
2 Apr 25 |                                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
28 Mar 25 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
2 Apr 25 |                                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
28 Mar 25 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Jim Burns |
2 Apr 25 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
27 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 26 | | WM |
27 Mar 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | joes |
28 Mar 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 24 | | Alan Mackenzie |
29 Mar 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
2 Apr 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 22 | | WM |
3 Apr 25 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 21 | | Alan Mackenzie |
3 Apr 25 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 17 | | WM |
4 Apr 25 |                                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 7 | | Alan Mackenzie |
4 Apr 25 |                                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 5 | | WM |
4 Apr 25 |                                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 4 | | FromTheRafters |
5 Apr 25 |                                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | WM |
5 Apr 25 |                                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | FromTheRafters |
5 Apr 25 |                                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
5 Apr 25 |                                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
13 Apr 25 |                                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 9 | | joes |
13 Apr 25 |                                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | WM |
13 Apr 25 |                                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | FromTheRafters |
13 Apr 25 |                                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
13 Apr 25 |                                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 5 | | WM |
14 Apr 25 |                                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 4 | | joes |
14 Apr 25 |                                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | WM |
14 Apr 25 |                                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | joes |
14 Apr 25 |                                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
4 Apr 25 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | Moebius |
4 Apr 25 |                                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
4 Apr 25 |                                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
27 Mar 25 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 8 | | joes |
27 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 7 | | WM |
27 Mar 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 4 | | joes |
2 Apr 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 3 | | WM |
2 Apr 25 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 2 | | joes |
4 Apr 25 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
28 Mar 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
2 Apr 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
27 Mar 25 |                                                            Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 23 | | Alan Mackenzie |
27 Mar 25 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 9 | | Moebius |
27 Mar 25 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 8 | | Alan Mackenzie |
27 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | FromTheRafters |
27 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 5 | | Jim Burns |
28 Mar 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Alan Mackenzie |
29 Mar 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
2 Apr 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
2 Apr 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
28 Mar 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
27 Mar 25 |                                                             Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 13 | | WM |
27 Mar 25 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | joes |
28 Mar 25 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
2 Apr 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
28 Mar 25 |                                                              Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 9 | | Alan Mackenzie |
2 Apr 25 |                                                               Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 8 | | WM |
3 Apr 25 |                                                                Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 7 | | Alan Mackenzie |
3 Apr 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
3 Apr 25 |                                                                 Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 5 | | WM |
13 Apr 25 |                                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 4 | | joes |
13 Apr 25 |                                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | WM |
14 Apr 25 |                                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | joes |
14 Apr 25 |                                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | joes |
22 Mar 25 |                                                  Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 34 | | Alan Mackenzie |
22 Mar 25 |                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 14 | | Moebius |
22 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 13 | | Moebius |
22 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 10 | | Alan Mackenzie |
23 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 9 | | WM |
23 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 8 | | Alan Mackenzie |
23 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (law(s) of large numbers) | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
24 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 6 | | WM |
24 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 5 | | Alan Mackenzie |
24 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
24 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
25 Mar 25 |                                                          Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                           Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Alan Mackenzie |
23 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | WM |
24 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | joes |
23 Mar 25 |                                                   Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 19 | | WM |
23 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Python |
23 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
24 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 6 | | joes |
24 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 5 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 4 | | joes |
25 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | joes |
26 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
24 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 10 | | Alan Mackenzie |
24 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 8 | | Moebius |
24 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 7 | | Alan Mackenzie |
24 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
24 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
24 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 3 | | Moebius |
25 Mar 25 |                                                        Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
25 Mar 25 |                                                         Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
25 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | WM |
21 Mar 25 |                                                Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | FromTheRafters |
22 Mar 25 |                                                 Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 2 | | WM |
22 Mar 25 |                                                  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
22 Mar 25 |                                                Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 58 | | Jim Burns |
22 Mar 25 |                                                 Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 57 | | WM |
22 Mar 25 |                                                  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 6 | | joes |
23 Mar 25 |                                                   Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 5 | | WM |
24 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | joes |
24 Mar 25 |                                                     "dark numbers" | 3 | | WM |
25 Mar 25 |                                                      Re: "dark numbers" | 2 | | joes |
25 Mar 25 |                                                       Re: "dark numbers" | 1 | | WM |
22 Mar 25 |                                                  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 50 | | Jim Burns |
23 Mar 25 |                                                   Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 49 | | WM |
23 Mar 25 |                                                    Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 5 | | Jim Burns |
23 Mar 25 |                                                     Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | WM |