comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Jun 25 i i   i   +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3joes
10 Jun 25 i i   i   i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
11 Jun 25 i i   i   i `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
11 Jun 25 i i   i   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3Fred. Zwarts
11 Jun 25 i i   i    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
11 Jun 25 i i   i     `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
9 Jun 25 i i   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point62dbush
9 Jun 25 i i    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point61olcott
9 Jun 25 i i     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point60dbush
9 Jun 25 i i      `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point59olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point55dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point54olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point53dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point51olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point50dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point48olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i i+* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point44dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point43olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii +- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point41dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point40olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point39dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point38olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point37dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii      `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point36olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii       `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point35dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii        `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point34olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii         `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point33dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii          `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point32olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii           `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point31dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii            `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point30olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii             `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point29dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii              `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point28olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point14dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point13olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point12dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point11olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point10dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point9olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point8dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i      `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point7olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i       +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point4dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i       i+- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
10 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i       i+- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
10 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i       i`- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i       `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               i        `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii               `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point13dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii                `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point12olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii                 `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point11dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii                  +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point4olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii                  i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii                  i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii                  i  `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1dbush
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii                  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point6Richard Heathfield
10 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii                   +- It has always been impossible to define an INPUT that does the opposite of its halt decider1olcott
10 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii                   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point4Mike Terry
10 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii                    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3olcott
10 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii                     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2Richard Damon
10 Jun 25 i i       i  i ii                      `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
10 Jun 25 i i       i  i i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3Mikko
10 Jun 25 i i       i  i i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
10 Jun 25 i i       i  i i  `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
9 Jun 25 i i       i  i `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun 25 i i       i  `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
10 Jun 25 i i       `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3Mikko
10 Jun 25 i i        `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
10 Jun 25 i i         `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
9 Jun 25 i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2Richard Damon
9 Jun 25 i  `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun 25 +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point14Keith Thompson
9 Jun 25 i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point13olcott
9 Jun 25 i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point12Keith Thompson
9 Jun 25 i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point11olcott
9 Jun 25 i   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point10Fred. Zwarts
9 Jun 25 i    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point9olcott
10 Jun 25 i     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point8Fred. Zwarts
10 Jun 25 i      `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point7olcott
11 Jun 25 i       `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point6Fred. Zwarts
11 Jun 25 i        `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point5olcott
11 Jun 25 i         +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3joes
11 Jun 25 i         i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
13 Jun 25 i         i `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Mikko
11 Jun 25 i         `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
9 Jun 25 +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point7Mikko
9 Jun 25 i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point6olcott
10 Jun 25 i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point5Mikko
10 Jun 25 i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point4olcott
11 Jun 25 i   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3Mikko
11 Jun 25 i    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
13 Jun 25 i     `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Mikko
9 Jun 25 `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point31Richard Damon
9 Jun 25  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point30olcott
10 Jun 25   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point29Mikko
10 Jun 25    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point28olcott
10 Jun 25     +- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
11 Jun 25     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point26Mikko
11 Jun 25      `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point25olcott
11 Jun 25       +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point11joes
11 Jun 25       i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point10olcott
11 Jun 25       i +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point8joes
11 Jun 25       i i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point7olcott
12 Jun 25       i i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point6Fred. Zwarts
12 Jun 25       i i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point5olcott
12 Jun 25       i i   +- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Richard Damon
13 Jun 25       i i   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3Fred. Zwarts
13 Jun 25       i i    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
14 Jun 25       i i     `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Fred. Zwarts
13 Jun 25       i `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Mikko
13 Jun 25       `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point13Mikko
14 Jun 25        `* The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++12olcott
15 Jun 25         +* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++2Fred. Zwarts
15 Jun 25         i`- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1olcott
15 Jun 25         `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++9Mikko
15 Jun 25          `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++8olcott
16 Jun 25           `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++7Mikko
16 Jun 25            `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++6olcott
17 Jun 25             +- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Richard Damon
17 Jun 25             `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++4Mikko
17 Jun 25              `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++3olcott
18 Jun 25               +- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Richard Damon
18 Jun 25               `- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Mikko
18 Jun 25 o Re: ChatGPT's latest opinion of Richard Damon1Richard Damon
17 Jun 25 o Re: ChatGPT's latest opinion of Richard Damon (typo)1olcott
17 Jun 25 o Re: ChatGPT's latest opinion of Richard Damon1olcott
16 Jun 25 * Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem4Mikko
17 Jun 25 +* Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem2Richard Damon
17 Jun 25 i`- Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem1Mikko
17 Jun 25 `- Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem1Mikko
15 Jun 25 * Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem7Richard Damon
15 Jun 25 +* Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem2olcott
15 Jun 25 i`- Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
15 Jun 25 +- Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 `* Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem3Mikko
17 Jun 25  +- Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
17 Jun 25  `- Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem1Mikko
16 Jun 25 * Re: Flibble's Argument: Infinite Regress Prevents the Halting Problem Paradox2Mikko
17 Jun 25 `- Re: Flibble's Argument: Infinite Regress Prevents the Halting Problem Paradox1Mikko
15 Jun 25 * Re: ChatGPT's opinion of Richard Damon5Alan Mackenzie
16 Jun 25 +* Re: ChatGPT's opinion of Richard Damon3Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 i+- Re: ChatGPT's opinion of Richard Damon & Comprehension of DDD1olcott
17 Jun 25 i`- Re: ChatGPT's opinion of Richard Damon1Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 `- Re: ChatGPT's opinion of Richard Damon1olcott
16 Jun 25 o Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem1Mikko
12 Jun 25 * HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT24olcott
12 Jun 25 +* Re: HHH(DD) INcorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT11Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 i`* Re: HHH(DD) INcorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT10olcott
13 Jun 25 i `* Re: HHH(DD) INcorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT9Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 i  `* Re: HHH(DD) INcorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT8olcott
14 Jun 25 i   `* Re: HHH(DD) correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT7olcott
14 Jun 25 i    `* Re: HHH(DD) correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT6Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 i     `* Re: HHH(DD) Does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT5olcott
14 Jun 25 i      +- Re: HHH(DD) Does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT1Fred. Zwarts
14 Jun 25 i      `* Re: HHH(DD) Does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT3Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 i       `* Re: HHH(DD) Does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++2olcott
14 Jun 25 i        `- Re: HHH(DD) Does incorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++ and Oclotts VERIFIED LIES1Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT12Mikko
13 Jun 25  `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT11olcott
14 Jun 25   +- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT1Fred. Zwarts
14 Jun 25   `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT9Mikko
14 Jun 25    `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++8olcott
14 Jun 25     +* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++2Mike Terry
14 Jun 25     i`- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++ Mike1olcott
14 Jun 25     +- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1Richard Damon
15 Jun 25     `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++4Mikko
15 Jun 25      `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++3olcott
15 Jun 25       +- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1Richard Damon
16 Jun 25       `- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1Mikko
15 Jun 25 * Re: Comparison of Flibble's and Damon's Views on the Halting Problem4Mikko
15 Jun 25 `* Re: Comparison of Flibble's and Damon's Views on the Halting Problem3olcott
15 Jun 25  +- Re: Comparison of Flibble's and Damon's Views on the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
16 Jun 25  `- Re: Comparison of Flibble's and Damon's Views on the Halting Problem1Mikko
15 Jun 25 * Re: Olcott is correct on this point4Mikko
15 Jun 25 `* Re: Olcott is correct on this point3olcott
15 Jun 25  +- Re: Olcott is correct on this point1Richard Damon
16 Jun 25  `- Re: Olcott is correct on this point1Mikko
15 Jun 25 * Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem2olcott
16 Jun 25 `- Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem1Mikko
16 Jun 25 o Re: Further analysis on Olcott's assertion1Mikko
15 Jun 25 * Re: Chinese Analysis of Flibble's Final Statement on the Halting Problem2olcott
16 Jun 25 `- Re: Chinese Analysis of Flibble's Final Statement on the Halting Problem1Mikko
16 Jun 25 o Re: ChatGPT's opinion of Richard Damon1Mikko
16 Jun 25 o Re: Most Amusing (Damon's Ego)1Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 o Re: ChatGPT's opinion of Richard Damon1Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 * Re: Further analysis on Olcott's assertion3Richard Damon
15 Jun 25 +- Re: Further analysis on Olcott's assertion1olcott
15 Jun 25 `- Re: Further analysis on Olcott's assertion1Richard Damon
15 Jun 25 * Re: Flibble's Core Claim: Infinite Regress Isn't Computable2olcott
15 Jun 25 `- Re: Flibble's Core Claim: Infinite Regress Isn't Computable1Richard Damon
15 Jun 25 o Re: Flibble's Core Claim: Infinite Regress Isn't Computable1Richard Damon
15 Jun 25 o Re: And those are the facts1Mikko
15 Jun 25 o Re: Analysis of "And those are the facts"1Mikko
14 Jun 25 * Re: Olcott is correct on this point2Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 `- Re: Olcott is correct on this point1Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 o Re: Olcott is correct on this point1olcott
31 May 25 * Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input52olcott
1 Jun 25 `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input51Mikko
1 Jun 25  +- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 25  `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input49olcott
2 Jun 25   +* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input6Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 25   i`* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input --- thorough5olcott
2 Jun 25   i +* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input --- thorough3Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 25   i i`* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input --- thorough2olcott
3 Jun 25   i i `- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input --- thorough1Fred. Zwarts
3 Jun 25   i `- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input --- thorough1Richard Damon
2 Jun 25   +* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input5Richard Damon
2 Jun 25   i`* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input4olcott
3 Jun 25   i `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input3Richard Damon
3 Jun 25   i  `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input --- Proof by MI2olcott
3 Jun 25   i   `- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input --- Proof by MI1Richard Damon
4 Jun 25   `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input37Mikko
4 Jun 25    `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input36olcott
5 Jun 25     +* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input6Fred. Zwarts
5 Jun 25     i`* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input5olcott
6 Jun 25     i +- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Richard Damon
6 Jun 25     i `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input3Fred. Zwarts
6 Jun 25     i  `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input2olcott
7 Jun 25     i   `- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Richard Damon
5 Jun 25     `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input29Mikko
5 Jun 25      `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input28olcott
6 Jun 25       +- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Richard Damon
6 Jun 25       +* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input19Mikko
6 Jun 25       i`* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input18olcott
7 Jun 25       i `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input17Mikko
7 Jun 25       i  `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input16olcott
8 Jun 25       i   +- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Richard Damon
8 Jun 25       i   `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input14Mikko
8 Jun 25       i    `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input13olcott
8 Jun 25       i     +- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Richard Damon
10 Jun 25       i     `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input11Mikko
10 Jun 25       i      `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input10olcott
11 Jun 25       i       +* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input8Fred. Zwarts
11 Jun 25       i       i`* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input7olcott
11 Jun 25       i       i +- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Richard Damon
12 Jun 25       i       i +- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Fred. Zwarts
13 Jun 25       i       i `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input4Mikko
13 Jun 25       i       i  `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input3olcott
14 Jun 25       i       i   +- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Fred. Zwarts
14 Jun 25       i       i   `- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Mikko
13 Jun 25       i       `- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Mikko
6 Jun 25       `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input7Mikko
6 Jun 25        `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input6olcott
7 Jun 25         +- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Richard Damon
7 Jun 25         `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input4Mikko
7 Jun 25          `* Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input3olcott
8 Jun 25           +- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Richard Damon
8 Jun 25           `- Re: Every HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input1Mikko
13 Jun 25 * Re: And those are the facts2Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 `- Re: And those are the facts1Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 o Re: Comparison of Flibble's and Damon's Views on the Halting Problem1Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal