sci.physics.relativity

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324
Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Oct 24 i  i +* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.8rhertz
20 Oct 24 i  i i+* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.2J. J. Lodder
20 Oct 24 i  i ii`- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1Maciej Wozniak
20 Oct 24 i  i i`* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.5ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Oct 24 i  i i `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Oct 24 i  i i  +- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1rhertz
21 Oct 24 i  i i  `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.2J. J. Lodder
21 Oct 24 i  i i   `- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1Ross Finlayson
20 Oct 24 i  i `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.2Tom Roberts
20 Oct 24 i  i  `- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1Maciej Wozniak
19 Oct 24 i  `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.2Athel Cornish-Bowden
19 Oct 24 i   `- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1Maciej Wozniak
17 Oct 24 +* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.4JanPB
18 Oct 24 i+- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1rhertz
18 Oct 24 i`* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Oct 24 i `- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1Maciej Wozniak
21 Oct 24 `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.30LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Oct 24  `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.29rhertz
21 Oct 24   +* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Oct 24   i`- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1rhertz
23 Oct 24   `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.26J. J. Lodder
23 Oct 24    +- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1Maciej Wozniak
23 Oct 24    `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.24rhertz
25 Oct 24     `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.23LaurenceClarkCrossen
25 Oct 24      +* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.4Paul.B.Andersen
25 Oct 24      i+- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
25 Oct 24      i+- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
25 Oct 24      i`- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
25 Oct 24      `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.18ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
25 Oct 24       `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.17LaurenceClarkCrossen
25 Oct 24        `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.16ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
25 Oct 24         +* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.13LaurenceClarkCrossen
26 Oct 24         i+* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.10rhertz
26 Oct 24         ii`* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.9LaurenceClarkCrossen
26 Oct 24         ii +* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.5rhertz
26 Oct 24         ii i`* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.4LaurenceClarkCrossen
26 Oct 24         ii i `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.3rhertz
26 Oct 24         ii i  `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
26 Oct 24         ii i   `- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1Maciej Wozniak
26 Oct 24         ii `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.3J. J. Lodder
27 Oct 24         ii  +- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1Bertietaylor
27 Oct 24         ii  `- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
26 Oct 24         i`* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
26 Oct 24         i `- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
25 Oct 24         `* Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
26 Oct 24          `- Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.1J. J. Lodder
27 Oct 24 o Re: What is "local time"?1Bertietaylor
26 Oct 24 * Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru5Python
26 Oct 24 `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru4Maciej Wozniak
26 Oct 24  `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru3Python
26 Oct 24   `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru2Maciej Wozniak
26 Oct 24    `- Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru1Python
19 Oct 24 * Re: How electrons glide through aether without resistance10Bertietaylor
20 Oct 24 +* Re: How electrons glide through aether without resistance2rhertz
20 Oct 24 i`- Re: How electrons glide through aether without resistance1Bertietaylor
20 Oct 24 +- Re: How electrons glide through aether without resistance1Jim Pennino
20 Oct 24 `* Re: How electrons glide through aether without resistance6kazu
20 Oct 24  `* Re: How electrons glide through aether without resistance5Bertietaylor
20 Oct 24   `* Re: How electrons glide through aether without resistance4kazu
20 Oct 24    `* Re: How electrons glide through aether without resistance3bertietaylor
25 Oct 24     `* Re: How electrons glide through aether without resistance2kazu
25 Oct 24      `- Re: How electrons glide through aether without resistance1Bertietaylor
15 Oct 24 * Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?31rhertz
16 Oct 24 +* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?15Richard Hachel
16 Oct 24 i+* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?12Python
16 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?11Richard Hachel
17 Oct 24 ii `* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?10Python
17 Oct 24 ii  +* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?2Richard Hachel
17 Oct 24 ii  i`- Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?1Python
17 Oct 24 ii  +* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?6Richard Hachel
17 Oct 24 ii  i`* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?5Python
17 Oct 24 ii  i `* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?4Richard Hachel
17 Oct 24 ii  i  `* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?3Python
17 Oct 24 ii  i   `* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?2Richard Hachel
18 Oct 24 ii  i    `- Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?1Python
17 Oct 24 ii  `- Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?1Athel Cornish-Bowden
16 Oct 24 i`* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?2rhertz
16 Oct 24 i `- Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?1Richard Hachel
16 Oct 24 +* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?4Mikko
17 Oct 24 i`* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?3rhertz
18 Oct 24 i +- Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?1Mikko
18 Oct 24 i `- Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?1Paul.B.Andersen
16 Oct 24 +- Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?1Paul.B.Andersen
18 Oct 24 +- Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?1Bertietaylor
22 Oct 24 +* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?6LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Oct 24 i+* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?4Richard Hachel
22 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?3LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Oct 24 ii `* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?2Richard Hachel
23 Oct 24 ii  `- Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?1Paul.B.Andersen
22 Oct 24 i`- Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?1LaurenceClarkCrossen
25 Oct 24 `* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?3LaurenceClarkCrossen
25 Oct 24  `* Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?2Richard Hachel
25 Oct 24   `- Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?1LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Oct 24 * Michelson-Morley While Non-Inertial Versus Inertial3mme_wrt_eci
24 Oct 24 +- Re: Michelson-Morley While Non-Inertial Versus Inertial1Richard Hachel
25 Oct 24 `- Re: Michelson-Morley While Non-Inertial Versus Inertial1Bertietaylor
19 Oct 24 * Relativity theory from other angles29Ross Finlayson
19 Oct 24 +* Re: Relativity theory from other angles24bertietaylor
19 Oct 24 i`* Re: Relativity theory from other angles23Ross Finlayson
19 Oct 24 i +* Re: Relativity theory from other angles3Ross Finlayson
19 Oct 24 i i`* Re: Relativity theory from other angles2rhertz
19 Oct 24 i i `- Re: Relativity theory from other angles1Ross Finlayson
19 Oct 24 i +* Re: Relativity theory from other angles16Bertietaylor
19 Oct 24 i i`* Re: Relativity theory from other angles15Ross Finlayson
20 Oct 24 i i `* Re: Relativity theory from other angles14Bertietaylor
20 Oct 24 i i  `* Re: Relativity theory from other angles13Ross Finlayson
20 Oct 24 i i   `* Re: Relativity theory from other angles12bertietaylor
21 Oct 24 i i    `* Re: Relativity theory from other angles11Ross Finlayson
21 Oct 24 i i     +* Re: Relativity theory from other angles7Ross Finlayson
22 Oct 24 i i     i`* Re: Relativity theory from other angles6Bertietaylor
22 Oct 24 i i     i +* Re: Relativity theory from other angles2LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Oct 24 i i     i i`- Re: Relativity theory from other angles1Ross Finlayson
22 Oct 24 i i     i `* Re: Relativity theory from other angles3Bertietaylor
23 Oct 24 i i     i  `* Re: Relativity theory from other angles2Ross Finlayson
23 Oct 24 i i     i   `- Re: Relativity theory from other angles1Bertietaylor
21 Oct 24 i i     `* Re: Relativity theory from other angles3Bertietaylor
21 Oct 24 i i      `* Re: Relativity theory from other angles2Ross Finlayson
22 Oct 24 i i       `- Re: Relativity theory from other angles1Bertietaylor
19 Oct 24 i `* Re: Relativity theory from other angles3Thomas Heger
19 Oct 24 i  `* Re: Relativity theory from other angles2Ross Finlayson
20 Oct 24 i   `- Re: Relativity theory from other angles1Thomas Heger
19 Oct 24 +* Re: Relativity theory from other angles2rhertz
19 Oct 24 i`- Re: Relativity theory from other angles1Ross Finlayson
20 Oct 24 `* Re: Relativity theory from other angles2J. J. Lodder
21 Oct 24  `- Re: Relativity theory from other angles1Ross Finlayson
6 Oct 24 * Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed40bertietaylor
6 Oct 24 +* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed6Jim Pennino
6 Oct 24 i`* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed5bertietaylor
6 Oct 24 i `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed4Jim Pennino
6 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Maciej Wozniak
21 Oct 24 i  `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed2bertietaylor
21 Oct 24 i   `- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Jim Pennino
11 Oct 24 `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed33Aether Regained
12 Oct 24  +* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed31J. J. Lodder
13 Oct 24  i`* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed30Bertietaylor
13 Oct 24  i `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed29Athel Cornish-Bowden
13 Oct 24  i  `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed28Bertietaylor
13 Oct 24  i   +- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Bertietaylor
14 Oct 24  i   +* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed21J. J. Lodder
14 Oct 24  i   i`* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed20Athel Cornish-Bowden
15 Oct 24  i   i +- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Athel Cornish-Bowden
15 Oct 24  i   i +* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed17J. J. Lodder
15 Oct 24  i   i i`* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed16Athel Cornish-Bowden
15 Oct 24  i   i i +- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Bertietaylor
16 Oct 24  i   i i `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed14J. J. Lodder
16 Oct 24  i   i i  `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed13Bertietaylor
16 Oct 24  i   i i   `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed12Athel Cornish-Bowden
16 Oct 24  i   i i    `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed11bertietaylor
16 Oct 24  i   i i     `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed10J. J. Lodder
16 Oct 24  i   i i      +- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1gharnagel
16 Oct 24  i   i i      `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed8Bertietaylor
17 Oct 24  i   i i       `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed7Bertietaylor
17 Oct 24  i   i i        `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed6gharnagel
17 Oct 24  i   i i         `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed5bertietaylor
17 Oct 24  i   i i          `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed4J. J. Lodder
17 Oct 24  i   i i           `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed3Bertietaylor
18 Oct 24  i   i i            `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed2Bertietaylor
18 Oct 24  i   i i             `- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Bertietaylor
15 Oct 24  i   i `- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1bertietaylor
14 Oct 24  i   `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed5J. J. Lodder
15 Oct 24  i    +* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed3Bertietaylor
15 Oct 24  i    i`* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed2J. J. Lodder
15 Oct 24  i    i `- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1bertietaylor
15 Oct 24  i    `- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Bertietaylor
13 Oct 24  `- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Bertietaylor
20 Oct 24 o Stella (6years--->14 years)1Richard Hachel
18 Oct 24 * Time and its alleged influence5Maciej Wozniak
18 Oct 24 `* Re: Time and its alleged influence4Python
18 Oct 24  `* Re: Time and its alleged influence3Maciej Wozniak
19 Oct 24   `* Re: Time and its alleged influence2rhertz
19 Oct 24    `- Re: Time and its alleged influence1Ross Finlayson
19 Oct 24 o A lesson of what the words mean1Maciej Wozniak
16 Oct 24 * Re: What is "local time"?3Mikko
16 Oct 24 `* Re: What is "local time"?2Richard Hachel
18 Oct 24  `- Re: What is "local time"?1Mikko
9 Oct 24 * Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI30rhertz
9 Oct 24 +- Fahrenheit 451 (Was: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI)1Mild Shock
10 Oct 24 +- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Ross Finlayson
11 Oct 24 +* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI3Thomas Heger
11 Oct 24 i`* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI2Richard Hachel
11 Oct 24 i `- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Jim Pennino
11 Oct 24 +* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI5ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
11 Oct 24 i+- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Bertietaylor
11 Oct 24 i`* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI3Ross Finlayson
12 Oct 24 i +- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Thomas Heger
17 Oct 24 i `- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Ross Finlayson
11 Oct 24 +- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Bertietaylor
11 Oct 24 +- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Aether Regained
12 Oct 24 `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI17kazu
12 Oct 24  +* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI3Maciej Wozniak
12 Oct 24  i`* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI2kazu
12 Oct 24  i `- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Maciej Wozniak
12 Oct 24  `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI13Bertietaylor
12 Oct 24   `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI12kazu
12 Oct 24    `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI11Bertietaylor
12 Oct 24     `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI10kazu
12 Oct 24      `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI9Bertietaylor
12 Oct 24       `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI8kazu
13 Oct 24        `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI7Bertietaylor
13 Oct 24         `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI6Jim Pennino
13 Oct 24          +* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI4Bertietaylor
13 Oct 24          i`* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI3Jim Pennino
13 Oct 24          i +- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Maciej Wozniak
13 Oct 24          i `- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Bertietaylor
13 Oct 24          `- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Maciej Wozniak
16 Oct 24 o Re: What is "local time"?1Thomas Heger
14 Oct 24 * Re: What is "local time"?2Sylvia Else
16 Oct 24 `- Re: What is "local time"?1Thomas Heger
1 Oct 24 * the notion of relativity of simultaneity71Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity40Python
1 Oct 24 i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity36Thomas Heger
1 Oct 24 ii+- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
1 Oct 24 ii`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity34Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 ii `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity33Python
1 Oct 24 ii  +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 ii  i`- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
2 Oct 24 ii  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity30Thomas Heger
2 Oct 24 ii   +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity26Python
2 Oct 24 ii   i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct 24 ii   ii`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
2 Oct 24 ii   ii `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct 24 ii   i+- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity21Thomas Heger
3 Oct 24 ii   i +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity4Python
3 Oct 24 ii   i i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
3 Oct 24 ii   i i  `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity5Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
3 Oct 24 ii   i ii`- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
5 Oct 24 ii   i i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Thomas Heger
5 Oct 24 ii   i i `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity11Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i  +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
5 Oct 24 ii   i  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity9Thomas Heger
5 Oct 24 ii   i   `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity8Richard Hachel
6 Oct 24 ii   i    `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity7Thomas Heger
6 Oct 24 ii   i     +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
6 Oct 24 ii   i     `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity5Richard Hachel
8 Oct 24 ii   i      `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity4Thomas Heger
8 Oct 24 ii   i       `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Maciej Wozniak
11 Oct 24 ii   i        `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Thomas Heger
11 Oct 24 ii   i         `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
2 Oct 24 ii   `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii    `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Thomas Heger
3 Oct 24 ii     `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 i +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
2 Oct 24 i `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Mikko
7 Oct 24 +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity27JanPB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal