comp.lang.c

Liste des GroupesPages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526
Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i i i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain6bart
30 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i i i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain5Michael S
30 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i i i  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain4David Brown
30 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i i i   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3Michael S
30 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i i i    +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
9 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i i i    `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
30 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i i `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson
29 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain6David Brown
29 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain5bart
30 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain4David Brown
30 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i i  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3bart
30 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i i   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2David Brown
1 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i i    `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1bart
1 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain27Ben Bacarisse
1 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain26bart
1 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i   +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain24Ben Bacarisse
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i    `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain23bart
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i     `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain22Ben Bacarisse
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i      `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain21bart
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i       +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Kaz Kylheku
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i       i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Kaz Kylheku
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i       +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Ben Bacarisse
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i       `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain17David Brown
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain14bart
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        i+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain12DFS
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        ii+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3bart
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        iii`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Michael S
4 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        iii `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Malcolm McLean
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        ii+- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Ben Bacarisse
4 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        ii`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain7David Brown
2 Jan 25 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        ii `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain6DFS
2 Jan 25 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        ii  +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Phillip
2 Jan 25 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        ii  +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Waldek Hebisch
3 Jan 25 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        ii  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3David Brown
3 Jan 25 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        ii   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2DFS
3 Jan 25 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        ii    `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
4 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i        `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Malcolm McLean
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i         `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain9David Brown
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain7Michael S
29 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   ii`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain6David Brown
29 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   ii +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3Kaz Kylheku
29 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   ii i+- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
29 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   ii i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Richard Harnden
29 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   ii `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Michael S
30 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   ii  `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1bart
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i   `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
27 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain36Tim Rentsch
27 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Keith Thompson
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       ii`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain11bart
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       ii+- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       ii+- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       ii+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain7Kaz Kylheku
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       iii+- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Michael S
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       iii`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain5bart
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       iii +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2bart
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       iii i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1bart
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       iii `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2bart
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       iii  `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Michael S
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       ii`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1bart
1 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i`* tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain22Michael S
1 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i +- Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
1 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i +* Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain13Keith Thompson
1 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i i+- Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i i+* Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain9Michael S
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i ii+* Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain6bart
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i iii+* Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain4Michael S
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i iiii+* Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain2bart
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i iiiii`- Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain1Michael S
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i iiii`- Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain1Michael S
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i iii`- Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i ii+- Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i ii`- Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain1James Kuyper
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i i`* Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain2Malcolm McLean
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i i `- Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain1Ben Bacarisse
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i +* Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain6Michael S
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i i+* Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain4Ben Bacarisse
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i ii`* Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain3Michael S
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i ii `* Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain2Ben Bacarisse
2 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i ii  `- Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain1Michael S
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i i`- Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain1Michael S
3 Jul 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       i `- Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain1Michael S
27 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i       `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Ben Bacarisse
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     i        `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Richard Harnden
28 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   i     `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Michael S
26 Jun 24 ii i      i i i   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Vir Campestris
26 Jun 24 ii i      i i i    `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
17 Jun 24 ii i      i i +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2bart
18 Jun 24 ii i      i i i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
18 Jun 24 ii i      i i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2James Kuyper
18 Jun 24 ii i      i i  `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
17 Jun 24 ii i      i +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain8bart
18 Jun 24 ii i      i i+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2David Brown
18 Jun 24 ii i      i ii`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1bart
18 Jun 24 ii i      i i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain5James Kuyper
18 Jun 24 ii i      i i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain4bart
18 Jun 24 ii i      i i  +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2James Kuyper
18 Jun 24 ii i      i i  i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1bart
18 Jun 24 ii i      i i  `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
18 Jun 24 ii i      i +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain5bart
19 Jun 24 ii i      i i+- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
19 Jun 24 ii i      i i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3David Brown
19 Jun 24 ii i      i i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2bart
19 Jun 24 ii i      i i  `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
20 Jun 24 ii i      i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain8Vir Campestris
21 Jun 24 ii i      i  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain7David Brown
21 Jun 24 ii i      i   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain6bart
21 Jun 24 ii i      i    `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain5David Brown
21 Jun 24 ii i      i     +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2bart
23 Jun 24 ii i      i     i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
21 Jun 24 ii i      i     `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2bart
23 Jun 24 ii i      i      `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
17 Jun 24 ii i      `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3Malcolm McLean
17 Jun 24 ii i       `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2David Brown
18 Jun 24 ii i        `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1James Kuyper
12 Jun 24 ii `* Topicality is not your strong suit (Was: Baby X is bor nagain)2Kenny McCormack
12 Jun 24 ii  `- Re: Topicality is not your strong suit (Was: Baby X is bor nagain)1Bonita Montero
11 Jun 24 i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3bart
11 Jun 24 i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Bonita Montero
11 Jun 24 i  `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1bart
11 Jun 24 `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Kalevi Kolttonen
1 Jan 25 * Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?18wij
1 Jan 25 +- Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jan 25 `* Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?16Keith Thompson
1 Jan 25  `* Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?15wij
1 Jan 25   +* Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?4bart
1 Jan 25   i+* Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?2wij
2 Jan 25   ii`- Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?1bart
1 Jan 25   i`- Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jan 25   `* Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?10Keith Thompson
2 Jan 25    +- Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?1Alexis
2 Jan 25    +- Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Jan 25    `* Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?7wij
2 Jan 25     `* Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?6Keith Thompson
2 Jan 25      `* Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?5BGB
3 Jan 25       +* Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?2Lew Pitcher
3 Jan 25       i`- Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?1BGB
3 Jan 25       +- Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jan 25       `- Re: Can 'graphics' be a file descriptor?1Chris M. Thomasson
1 Jan 25 o Happy new year1Rosario19
27 Dec 24 * `atomic_fetch_add` on pointer types?4Andrey Tarasevich
28 Dec 24 +- Re: `atomic_fetch_add` on pointer types?1Keith Thompson
28 Dec 24 +- Re: `atomic_fetch_add` on pointer types?1Chris M. Thomasson
31 Dec 24 `- Re: `atomic_fetch_add` on pointer types?1Tim Rentsch
21 Dec 24 o Re: constexpr is really very smart!1James Kuyper
19 Dec 24 * Something like string-streams existing in "C"?15Janis Papanagnou
19 Dec 24 +- Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?1Keith Thompson
19 Dec 24 +- Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Dec 24 +* Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?11BlueManedHawk
19 Dec 24 i`* Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?10Kaz Kylheku
19 Dec 24 i `* Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?9Michael S
19 Dec 24 i  `* Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?8Kaz Kylheku
20 Dec 24 i   +* Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?6Thiago Adams
20 Dec 24 i   i`* Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?5Michael S
20 Dec 24 i   i +* Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?3Thiago Adams
20 Dec 24 i   i i+- Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?1Michael S
20 Dec 24 i   i i`- Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Dec 24 i   i `- Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?1Keith Thompson
20 Dec 24 i   `- Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?1Michael S
20 Dec 24 `- Re: Something like string-streams existing in "C"?1Janis Papanagnou
13 Dec 24 * C89 "bug"17Thiago Adams
13 Dec 24 +* Re: C89 "bug"6Michael S
13 Dec 24 i`* Re: C89 "bug"5Thiago Adams
13 Dec 24 i `* Re: C89 "bug"4Kaz Kylheku
13 Dec 24 i  `* Re: C89 "bug"3Thiago Adams
13 Dec 24 i   `* Re: C89 "bug"2bart
13 Dec 24 i    `- Re: C89 "bug"1Thiago Adams
13 Dec 24 +* Re: C89 "bug"8Keith Thompson
13 Dec 24 i`* Re: C89 "bug"7Thiago Adams
13 Dec 24 i +* Re: C89 "bug"5David Brown
13 Dec 24 i i+* Re: C89 "bug"2Thiago Adams
13 Dec 24 i ii`- Re: C89 "bug"1Thiago Adams
14 Dec 24 i i`* Re: C89 "bug"2bart
15 Dec 24 i i `- Re: C89 "bug"1David Brown
13 Dec 24 i `- Re: C89 "bug"1Keith Thompson
14 Dec 24 `* Re: C89 "bug"2Waldek Hebisch
14 Dec 24  `- Re: C89 "bug"1Keith Thompson
12 Dec 24 * I want to use the g++ template in the "C" gcc software11aotto1968
12 Dec 24 +- Re: I want to use the g++ template in the "C" gcc software1Bonita Montero
12 Dec 24 +* Re: I want to use the g++ template in the "C" gcc software4David Brown
12 Dec 24 i`* Re: I want to use the g++ template in the "C" gcc software3aotto1968
12 Dec 24 i `* Re: I want to use the g++ template in the "C" gcc software2Chris M. Thomasson
12 Dec 24 i  `- Re: I want to use the g++ template in the "C" gcc software1Kaz Kylheku
12 Dec 24 +* Re: I want to use the g++ template in the "C" gcc software3Kaz Kylheku
12 Dec 24 i+- Re: I want to use the g++ template in the "C" gcc software1aotto1968
12 Dec 24 i`- Re: I want to use the g++ template in the "C" gcc software1Chris M. Thomasson
12 Dec 24 `* Re: I want to use the g++ template in the "C" gcc software2Chan
13 Dec 24  `- Re: I want to use the g++ template in the "C" gcc software1Keith Thompson
5 Dec 24 * This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)20olcott
5 Dec 24 +- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1Chris M. Thomasson
5 Dec 24 +* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)12Bonita Montero
7 Dec 24 i`* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)11olcott
7 Dec 24 i `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)10Richard Damon
7 Dec 24 i  +* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)8olcott
7 Dec 24 i  i`* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)7Richard Damon
7 Dec 24 i  i `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)6olcott
7 Dec 24 i  i  `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)5Richard Damon
7 Dec 24 i  i   `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)4olcott
7 Dec 24 i  i    `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)3olcott
8 Dec 24 i  i     `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)2Richard Damon
8 Dec 24 i  i      `- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1olcott
7 Dec 24 i  `- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1olcott
8 Dec 24 `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)6olcott
8 Dec 24  +* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)3Richard Damon
9 Dec 24  i`* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)2olcott
9 Dec 24  i `- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1olcott
11 Dec 24  `* The essence of my halting problem work2olcott
11 Dec 24   `- Re: The essence of my halting problem work1Richard Damon
4 Nov 24 * is double slower?18fir
4 Nov 24 +* Re: is double slower?5Chris M. Thomasson
4 Nov 24 i`* Re: is double slower?4fir
4 Nov 24 i +* Re: is double slower?2fir
4 Nov 24 i i`- Re: is double slower?1Chris M. Thomasson
4 Nov 24 i `- Re: is double slower?1Chris M. Thomasson
4 Nov 24 +- Re: is double slower?1Bonita Montero
5 Nov 24 `* Re: is double slower?11David Brown
5 Nov 24  +* Re: is double slower?8fir
5 Nov 24  i+- Re: is double slower?1fir
5 Nov 24  i+* Re: is double slower?3fir
6 Nov 24  ii`* Re: is double slower?2fir
6 Nov 24  ii `- Re: is double slower?1Chris M. Thomasson
5 Nov 24  i`* Re: is double slower?3David Brown
5 Nov 24  i `* Re: is double slower?2fir
5 Nov 24  i  `- Re: is double slower?1fir
9 Dec 24  `* Re: is double slower?2Bonita Montero
9 Dec 24   `- Re: is double slower?1Bonita Montero
30 Nov 24 * best approach for multithreading (?)23fir
1 Dec 24 +* Re: best approach for multithreading (?)20candycanearter07
1 Dec 24 i+* Re: best approach for multithreading (?)18Lew Pitcher
1 Dec 24 ii`* Re: best approach for multithreading (?)17Kaz Kylheku
2 Dec 24 ii `* Re: best approach for multithreading (?)16Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24 ii  `* Re: best approach for multithreading (?)15Kaz Kylheku
3 Dec 24 ii   +- Re: best approach for multithreading (?)1Chris M. Thomasson
6 Dec 24 ii   `* Re: best approach for multithreading (?)13James Kuyper
6 Dec 24 ii    +* Re: best approach for multithreading (?)11Kaz Kylheku
6 Dec 24 ii    i+- Re: best approach for multithreading (?)1Kaz Kylheku
7 Dec 24 ii    i`* Re: best approach for multithreading (?)9James Kuyper
7 Dec 24 ii    i +- Re: best approach for multithreading (?)1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Dec 24 ii    i +- Re: best approach for multithreading (?)1Tim Rentsch
8 Dec 24 ii    i `* Re: best approach for multithreading (?)6Kaz Kylheku
8 Dec 24 ii    i  +* Re: best approach for multithreading (?)4Chris M. Thomasson
8 Dec 24 ii    i  i`* Re: best approach for multithreading (?)3Kaz Kylheku
9 Dec 24 ii    i  i +- Re: best approach for multithreading (?)1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Dec 24 ii    i  i `- Re: best approach for multithreading (?)1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Dec 24 ii    i  `- Re: best approach for multithreading (?)1Waldek Hebisch
6 Dec 24 ii    `- Re: best approach for multithreading (?)1Chris M. Thomasson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal