comp.lang.forth
Liste des Groupes
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Date
Sujet
#
Auteur
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
2
Anton Ertl
17 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
mhx
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
Anton Ertl
27 Sep 24
value-flavoured structures (was: Avoid treating the stack as an array)
26
Ruvim
27 Sep 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
15
minforth
27 Sep 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
1
mhx
27 Sep 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
13
Ruvim
27 Sep 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
12
minforth
27 Sep 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
8
Ruvim
28 Sep 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
6
Paul Rubin
28 Sep 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
2
dxf
28 Sep 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
1
Paul Rubin
28 Sep 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
3
albert
28 Sep 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
2
Paul Rubin
28 Sep 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
1
Paul Rubin
28 Sep 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
1
dxf
3 Oct 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
3
Anton Ertl
4 Oct 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
2
dxf
4 Oct 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
1
albert
3 Oct 24
Re: value-flavoured structures (was: Avoid treating the stack as an array)
10
Anton Ertl
4 Oct 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
9
Ruvim
4 Oct 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
8
Anton Ertl
4 Oct 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
7
Ruvim
4 Oct 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
6
Anton Ertl
5 Oct 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
5
Ruvim
5 Oct 24
Re: value-flavoured structures
4
Anton Ertl
6 Oct 24
value-flavoured properties of a word (was: value-flavoured structures)
1
Ruvim
6 Oct 24
value-flavoured approach (was: value-flavoured structures)
1
Ruvim
6 Oct 24
value-flavoured approach in API (was: value-flavoured structures)
1
Ruvim
14 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
37
Anton Ertl
14 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
34
Ahmed
14 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
32
Anton Ertl
14 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
31
Ahmed
14 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
Ahmed
14 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
7
Ahmed
14 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
6
mhx
14 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
4
Ahmed
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
3
minforth
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
2
Ahmed
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
Ahmed
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
albert
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
22
dxf
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
16
Ahmed
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
15
mhx
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
14
ahmed
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
13
Ahmed
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
12
mhx
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
Ahmed
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
3
dxf
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
Ahmed
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
mhx
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
7
Paul Rubin
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
Anton Ertl
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
3
mhx
17 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
2
albert
17 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
minforth
17 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
2
Stephen Pelc
17 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
Paul Rubin
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
5
Paul Rubin
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
4
dxf
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
3
Paul Rubin
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
minforth
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
dxf
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
albert
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
2
dxf
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
albert
12 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
16
Anton Ertl
15 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
15
Paul Rubin
16 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
14
Anton Ertl
18 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
13
dxf
18 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
12
Paul Rubin
18 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
11
dxf
18 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
10
Paul Rubin
19 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
9
dxf
28 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
8
Paul Rubin
28 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
mhx
29 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
3
dxf
29 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
2
Paul Rubin
30 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
dxf
29 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
3
albert
29 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
mhx
29 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
Paul Rubin
11 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
3
Hans Bezemer
11 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
albert
12 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
Paul Rubin
8 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
6
Stephen Pelc
8 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
3
minforth
9 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
2
minforth
10 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
dxf
8 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
2
Anton Ertl
9 Sep 24
Re: Avoid treating the stack as an array [Re: "Back & Forth" is back!]
1
Anton Ertl
21 Sep 24
Code generation for DOES> in Gforth
2
Anton Ertl
3 Oct 24
Re: Code generation for DOES> in Gforth
1
Anton Ertl
30 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
6
mhx
30 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
4
albert
30 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
3
mhx
30 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
2
mhx
30 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
1
mhx
30 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
1
John Ames
30 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
1
Waldek Hebisch
29 Sep 24
Patterned division
1
mhx
9 Sep 24
KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
22
Krishna Myneni
9 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
21
Lars Brinkhoff
9 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
19
mhx
9 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
18
Anton Ertl
9 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
1
mhx
9 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
3
albert
9 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
2
Anton Ertl
10 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
1
albert
11 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
13
Krishna Myneni
13 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
12
Krishna Myneni
13 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
4
Paul Rubin
13 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
2
mhx
13 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
1
Paul Rubin
13 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
1
minforth
19 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
7
Krishna Myneni
19 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
6
mhx
19 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
1
minforth
19 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
4
Krishna Myneni
19 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
3
Krishna Myneni
26 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
2
Krishna Myneni
26 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
1
Krishna Myneni
10 Sep 24
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator
1
Krishna Myneni
23 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
2
Anton Ertl
24 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
1
Paul Rubin
24 Sep 24
Re: single-xt approach in the standard
2
Gerry Jackson
24 Sep 24
Re: single-xt approach in the standard
1
Ruvim
23 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
4
mhx
23 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
3
minforth
23 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
2
mhx
24 Sep 24
Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
1
minforth
26 Jun 24
0 SET-ORDER why?
64
Krishna Myneni
26 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
3
minforth
26 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
albert
26 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
Krishna Myneni
26 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
60
Anton Ertl
26 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
26
dxf
26 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
25
Ruvim
27 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
9
dxf
27 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
2
Gerry Jackson
28 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
dxf
28 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
6
Ruvim
28 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
4
dxf
28 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
3
Ruvim
28 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
2
dxf
1 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
dxf
29 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
dxf
27 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
15
Gerry Jackson
27 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
2
albert
27 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
minforth
27 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
dxf
27 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
7
Krishna Myneni
27 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
4
Krishna Myneni
27 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
2
Gerry Jackson
28 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
Krishna Myneni
28 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
dxf
29 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
2
Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
albert
28 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
4
Ruvim
28 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
2
albert
28 Jun 24
Recognizer protocol (was: 0 SET-ORDER why?)
1
Ruvim
4 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
Gerry Jackson
26 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
3
albert
26 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
minforth
26 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
Krishna Myneni
26 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
30
Krishna Myneni
28 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
29
Anton Ertl
28 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
Hans Bezemer
29 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
27
Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
26
dxf
30 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
25
Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
24
Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
23
minforth
30 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
22
Krishna Myneni
30 Jun 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
21
minforth
1 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
20
Krishna Myneni
1 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
2
mhx
1 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
Krishna Myneni
1 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
17
Ruvim
1 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
12
Krishna Myneni
1 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
6
dxf
2 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
dxf
3 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
4
Krishna Myneni
3 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
3
dxf
3 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
2
albert
3 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
dxf
1 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
3
albert
2 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
2
sjack
2 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
dxf
2 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
2
Ruvim
3 Jul 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
Krishna Myneni
21 Sep 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
4
Anthony Howe
22 Sep 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
3
Ruvim
22 Sep 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
2
Anthony Howe
22 Sep 24
Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
1
Ruvim
17 Sep 24
tags in forth : ctags gvim
1
albert
25 Aug 24
Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
22
ahmed
25 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
1
Ron AARON
25 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
1
minforth
25 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
17
Anton Ertl
25 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
16
ahmed
25 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
1
Krishna Myneni
28 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
14
Anton Ertl
28 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
13
ahmed
28 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
12
ahmed
28 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
11
mhx
28 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
10
ahmed
28 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
9
ahmed
28 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
7
mhx
28 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
6
ahmed
28 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
1
ahmed
29 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
4
mhx
6 Sep 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
3
ahmed
6 Sep 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
2
minforth
6 Sep 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
1
minforth
28 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
1
ahmed
25 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
2
Krishna Myneni
25 Aug 24
Re: Complex square root of -1 : zsqrt(-1)
1
Krishna Myneni
5 Sep 24
EuroForth 2024
2
Stephen Pelc
5 Sep 24
Re: EuroForth 2024
1
Kerr-Mudd, John
5 Sep 24
Ann: 8th ver 24.06 released
1
Ron AARON
2 Sep 24
EuroForth 2024
1
Stephen Pelc
28 Aug 24
Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix
11
dxf
29 Aug 24
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix
10
dxf
29 Aug 24
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix
9
mhx
29 Aug 24
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix
8
dxf
29 Aug 24
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix
7
mhx
30 Aug 24
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix
6
dxf
30 Aug 24
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix
5
mhx
30 Aug 24
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix
4
dxf
30 Aug 24
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix
3
mhx
30 Aug 24
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix
2
dxf
31 Aug 24
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix
1
dxf
17 Aug 24
Parallel Forth on a 44 core machine
11
mhx
18 Aug 24
Re: Parallel Forth on a 44 core machine
9
minforth
18 Aug 24
Re: Parallel Forth on a 44 core machine
6
mhx
18 Aug 24
Re: Parallel Forth on a 44 core machine
5
mhx
18 Aug 24
Re: Parallel Forth on a 44 core machine
3
Anton Ertl
18 Aug 24
Re: Parallel Forth on a 44 core machine
2
mhx
18 Aug 24
Re: Parallel Forth on a 44 core machine
1
Anton Ertl
18 Aug 24
Re: Parallel Forth on a 44 core machine
1
minforth
28 Aug 24
Re: Parallel Forth on a 44 core machine
2
mhx
28 Aug 24
Re: Parallel Forth on a 44 core machine
1
Paul Rubin
18 Aug 24
Re: Parallel Forth on a 44 core machine
1
mhx
25 Aug 24
Re: Negative number division
1
dave thompson 2
12 Aug 24
Re: portable or not? Volatile strings
8
Ruvim
12 Aug 24
Re: portable or not? Volatile strings
7
Ruvim
12 Aug 24
Re: portable or not? Volatile strings
6
albert
13 Aug 24
Re: portable or not? Volatile strings
5
dxf
21 Aug 24
Re: portable or not? Volatile strings
4
Hans Bezemer
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'
usenet
.
NewsPortal