sci.electronics.design

Liste des GroupesPages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Apr 25  i     `* Re: acoustic imager9john larkin
18 Apr 25  i      +* Re: acoustic imager7Cursitor Doom
19 Apr 25  i      i+* Re: acoustic imager5john larkin
19 Apr 25  i      ii+- Re: acoustic imager1Bill Sloman
19 Apr 25  i      ii`* Re: acoustic imager3Cursitor Doom
19 Apr 25  i      ii `* Re: acoustic imager2john larkin
19 Apr 25  i      ii  `- Re: acoustic imager1Bill Sloman
19 Apr 25  i      i`- Re: acoustic imager1Bill Sloman
19 Apr 25  i      `- Re: acoustic imager1Bill Sloman
17 Apr 25  `* Re: acoustic imager4Jeff Liebermann
17 Apr 25   +- Re: acoustic imager1john larkin
19 Apr 25   `* Re: acoustic imager2Jeff Liebermann
19 Apr 25    `- Re: acoustic imager1john larkin
15 Apr 25 * Re: Spice Model for ADI 500MHz Four-Quadrant Multiplier Added to my Website7Phil Hobbs
15 Apr 25 `* Re: Spice Model for ADI 500MHz Four-Quadrant Multiplier Added to my Website6john larkin
16 Apr 25  `* Re: Spice Model for ADI 500MHz Four-Quadrant Multiplier Added to my Website5Phil Hobbs
16 Apr 25   `* Re: Spice Model for ADI 500MHz Four-Quadrant Multiplier Added to my Website4john larkin
16 Apr 25    `* Re: Spice Model for ADI 500MHz Four-Quadrant Multiplier Added to my Website3john larkin
16 Apr 25     `* Re: Spice Model for ADI 500MHz Four-Quadrant Multiplier Added to my Website2john larkin
17 Apr 25      `- Re: Spice Model for ADI 500MHz Four-Quadrant Multiplier Added to my Website1Phil Hobbs
14 Apr 25 * some impressive numbers3john larkin
16 Apr 25 `* Re: some impressive numbers2Martin Rid
16 Apr 25  `- Re: some impressive numbers1john larkin
9 Apr 25 * UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval17john larkin
10 Apr 25 +* Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval3Phil Hobbs
10 Apr 25 i`* Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval2john larkin
10 Apr 25 i `- Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval1Phil Hobbs
10 Apr 25 +* Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval12Uwe Bonnes
10 Apr 25 i`* Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval11john larkin
10 Apr 25 i `* Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval10Uwe Bonnes
10 Apr 25 i  `* Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval9john larkin
10 Apr 25 i   `* Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval8john larkin
11 Apr 25 i    +* Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval6john larkin
15 Apr 25 i    i`* Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval5John R Walliker
15 Apr 25 i    i `* Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval4Joe Gwinn
16 Apr 25 i    i  +- Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval1John R Walliker
16 Apr 25 i    i  `* Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval2John R Walliker
16 Apr 25 i    i   `- Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval1Joe Gwinn
11 Apr 25 i    `- Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval1Phil Hobbs
15 Apr 25 `- Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval1john larkin
12 Apr 25 * Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator13Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 `* Re: Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator12Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25  `* Re: Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator11Edward Rawde
15 Apr 25   `* Re: Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator10Bill Sloman
15 Apr 25    `* Re: Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator9Edward Rawde
15 Apr 25     +* Re: Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator6Bill Sloman
15 Apr 25     i`* Re: Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator5Edward Rawde
15 Apr 25     i `* Re: Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator4Bill Sloman
15 Apr 25     i  `* Re: Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator3Edward Rawde
15 Apr 25     i   +- Re: Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator1Joe Gwinn
16 Apr 25     i   `- Re: Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator1Bill Sloman
15 Apr 25     `* Re: Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator2Edward Rawde
15 Apr 25      `- Re: Five transistor version of the low distortion sine-wave oscillator1Bill Sloman
13 Apr 25 * An 1897 Curve Tracer??7Cursitor Doom
13 Apr 25 +* Re: An 1897 Curve Tracer??2Cursitor Doom
13 Apr 25 i`- Re: An 1897 Curve Tracer??1Bill Sloman
13 Apr 25 +* Re: An 1897 Curve Tracer??2john larkin
13 Apr 25 i`- Re: An 1897 Curve Tracer??1Jeff Layman
14 Apr 25 `* Re: An 1897 Curve Tracer??2piglet
14 Apr 25  `- Re: An 1897 Curve Tracer??1Phil Hobbs
25 Mar 25 * KA7500 vs TL49416legg
25 Mar 25 +* Re: KA7500 vs TL4944Don
26 Mar 25 i`* Re: KA7500 vs TL4943legg
27 Mar 25 i `* Re: KA7500 vs TL4942Don
27 Mar 25 i  `- Re: KA7500 vs TL4941legg
3 Apr 25 +* Re: KA7500 vs TL4944John R Walliker
5 Apr 25 i`* Re: KA7500 vs TL4943legg
6 Apr 25 i `* Re: KA7500 vs TL4942John R Walliker
6 Apr 25 i  `- Re: KA7500 vs TL4941KevinJ93
9 Apr 25 `* Re: KA7500 vs TL4947Joerg
9 Apr 25  `* Re: KA7500 vs TL4946legg
9 Apr 25   `* Re: KA7500 vs TL4945john larkin
12 Apr 25    `* Re: KA7500 vs TL4944legg
12 Apr 25     `* Re: KA7500 vs TL4943john larkin
13 Apr 25      `* Re: KA7500 vs TL4942legg
13 Apr 25       `- Re: KA7500 vs TL4941john larkin
4 Apr 25 * Re: Simpson 260 repair11bitrex
4 Apr 25 `* Re: Simpson 260 repair10Cursitor Doom
4 Apr 25  +- Re: Simpson 260 repair1Liz Tuddenham
5 Apr 25  +* Re: Simpson 260 repair2Cursitor Doom
5 Apr 25  i`- Re: Simpson 260 repair1bitrex
5 Apr 25  +* Re: Simpson 260 repair2Jeff Layman
7 Apr 25  i`- Re: Simpson 260 repair1Cursitor Doom
10 Apr 25  `* Re: Simpson 260 repair4Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 25   `* Re: Simpson 260 repair3bitrex
13 Apr 25    +- Re: Simpson 260 repair1Cursitor Doom
13 Apr 25    `- Re: Simpson 260 repair1Liz Tuddenham
8 Apr 25 * Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius17Jean-Pierre Coulon
8 Apr 25 +* Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius2chrisq
8 Apr 25 i`- Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius1Jean-Pierre Coulon
8 Apr 25 +- Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius1Bill Sloman
8 Apr 25 `* Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius13Phil Hobbs
10 Apr 25  `* Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius12brian
10 Apr 25   +- Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius1Phil Hobbs
10 Apr 25   `* Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius10Don
11 Apr 25    `* Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius9Bill Sloman
11 Apr 25     +* Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius5Gerhard Hoffmann
11 Apr 25     i+* Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius3Bill Sloman
11 Apr 25     ii`* Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius2Dennis
11 Apr 25     ii `- Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius1Phil Hobbs
11 Apr 25     i`- Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius1ehsjr
11 Apr 25     `* Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius3Don
11 Apr 25      `* Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius2Bill Sloman
11 Apr 25       `- Re: Converting a NTC voltage into temperature in Celcius1Don
27 Mar 25 * tiny dc/dc27john larkin
28 Mar 25 +* Re: tiny dc/dc2bitrex
28 Mar 25 i`- Re: tiny dc/dc1john larkin
28 Mar 25 +- Re: tiny dc/dc1Phil Hobbs
28 Mar 25 +* Re: tiny dc/dc10Martin Rid
28 Mar 25 i+* Re: tiny dc/dc8john larkin
29 Mar 25 ii+- Re: tiny dc/dc1Bill Sloman
29 Mar 25 ii`* Re: tiny dc/dc6Phil Hobbs
29 Mar 25 ii `* Re: tiny dc/dc5john larkin
29 Mar 25 ii  `* Re: tiny dc/dc4Phil Hobbs
29 Mar 25 ii   `* Re: tiny dc/dc3john larkin
29 Mar 25 ii    `* Re: tiny dc/dc2Phil Hobbs
30 Mar 25 ii     `- Re: tiny dc/dc1john larkin
29 Mar 25 i`- Re: tiny dc/dc1legg
30 Mar 25 +- Re: tiny dc/dc1Sylvia Else
30 Mar 25 +* Re: tiny dc/dc11Uwe Bonnes
31 Mar 25 i+* Re: tiny dc/dc8john larkin
1 Apr 25 ii+- Re: tiny dc/dc1Uwe Bonnes
1 Apr 25 ii+* Re: tiny dc/dc3Uwe Bonnes
1 Apr 25 iii`* Re: tiny dc/dc2john larkin
9 Apr 25 iii `- Re: tiny dc/dc1Uwe Bonnes
4 Apr 25 ii`* Re: tiny dc/dc3Klaus Kragelund
4 Apr 25 ii `* Re: tiny dc/dc2john larkin
5 Apr 25 ii  `- Re: tiny dc/dc1Klaus Kragelund
5 Apr 25 i`* Re: tiny dc/dc2Klaus Kragelund
6 Apr 25 i `- Re: tiny dc/dc1Bill Sloman
1 Apr 25 `- Re: tiny dc/dc1john larkin
7 Apr 25 * Re: test-test14john larkin
7 Apr 25 `* Re: test-test13Phil Hobbs
7 Apr 25  +* Re: test-test2Klaus Kragelund
8 Apr 25  i`- Re: test-test1Joe Gwinn
7 Apr 25  +* Re: test-test2john larkin
8 Apr 25  i`- Re: test-test1Bill Sloman
8 Apr 25  `* Re: test-test8Liz Tuddenham
8 Apr 25   +* Re: test-test3Phil Hobbs
8 Apr 25   i+- Re: test-test1Liz Tuddenham
8 Apr 25   i`- Re: test-test1john larkin
8 Apr 25   +* Re: test-test3ehsjr
8 Apr 25   i`* Re: test-test2Liz Tuddenham
8 Apr 25   i `- Re: test-test1ehsjr
8 Apr 25   `- Re: test-test1john larkin
5 Apr 25 * Valve frequency multipliers (followup)9Liz Tuddenham
6 Apr 25 +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers (followup)3Liz Tuddenham
6 Apr 25 i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers (followup)2john larkin
6 Apr 25 i `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers (followup)1Liz Tuddenham
7 Apr 25 `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers (followup)5Phil Hobbs
7 Apr 25  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers (followup)4Liz Tuddenham
7 Apr 25   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers (followup)3Phil Hobbs
7 Apr 25    `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers (followup)2Liz Tuddenham
7 Apr 25     `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers (followup)1Phil Hobbs
5 Apr 25 o Re: Simpson 260 repair1chrisq
5 Apr 25 * Re: Simpson 260 repair3Jeff Liebermann
5 Apr 25 +- Re: Simpson 260 repair1Liz Tuddenham
5 Apr 25 `- Re: Simpson 260 repair1Joe Gwinn
1 Apr 25 * really big physics27john larkin
1 Apr 25 `* Re: really big physics26bitrex
1 Apr 25  `* Re: really big physics25john larkin
2 Apr 25   +- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
2 Apr 25   `* Re: really big physics23Cursitor Doom
2 Apr 25    +* Re: really big physics9john larkin
3 Apr 25    i+- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    i`* Re: really big physics7bitrex
3 Apr 25    i +* Re: really big physics4Liz Tuddenham
3 Apr 25    i i+* Re: really big physics2john larkin
3 Apr 25    i ii`- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    i i`- Re: really big physics1Phil Hobbs
3 Apr 25    i `* Re: really big physics2john larkin
3 Apr 25    i  `- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    `* Re: really big physics13bitrex
3 Apr 25     `* Re: really big physics12john larkin
3 Apr 25      +* Re: really big physics8Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i`* Re: really big physics7john larkin
4 Apr 25      i +- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25      i `* Re: really big physics5Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i  `* Re: really big physics4john larkin
4 Apr 25      i   `* Re: really big physics3Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i    `* Re: really big physics2john larkin
5 Apr 25      i     `- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25      +- Re: really big physics1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25      `* Re: really big physics2Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25       `- Re: really big physics1bitrex
4 Apr 25 * Not to be outdone...2Don Y
5 Apr 25 `- Re: Not to be outdone...1john larkin
5 Apr 25 * Re: Simpson 260 repair2Ralph Mowery
5 Apr 25 `- Re: Simpson 260 repair1john larkin
4 Apr 25 * Re: Simpson 260 repair5Joe Gwinn
4 Apr 25 `* Re: Simpson 260 repair4bitrex
4 Apr 25  +- Re: Simpson 260 repair1Liz Tuddenham
4 Apr 25  `* Re: Simpson 260 repair2Joe Gwinn
5 Apr 25   `- Re: Simpson 260 repair1Cursitor Doom
4 Apr 25 o Re: Simpson 260 repair1john larkin
1 Apr 25 * poor man's decal24Don Y
1 Apr 25 +* Re: poor man's decal6Martin Rid
2 Apr 25 i+- Re: poor man's decal1Don Y
2 Apr 25 i+* Re: poor man's decal2Phil Hobbs
3 Apr 25 ii`- Re: poor man's decal1john larkin
3 Apr 25 i`* Re: poor man's decal2Martin Brown
3 Apr 25 i `- Re: poor man's decal1Don Y
2 Apr 25 +- Re: poor man's decal1john larkin
2 Apr 25 +* Re: poor man's decal5john larkin
2 Apr 25 i`* Re: poor man's decal4John R Walliker
2 Apr 25 i `* Re: poor man's decal3john larkin
2 Apr 25 i  `* Re: poor man's decal2Cursitor Doom
2 Apr 25 i   `- Re: poor man's decal1john larkin
2 Apr 25 `* Re: poor man's decal11Liz Tuddenham
2 Apr 25  `* Re: poor man's decal10Don Y
2 Apr 25   +- Re: poor man's decal1Don Y
2 Apr 25   `* Re: poor man's decal8Liz Tuddenham
2 Apr 25    `* Re: poor man's decal7Don Y
2 Apr 25     `* Re: poor man's decal6Liz Tuddenham
3 Apr 25      `* Re: poor man's decal5Don Y
3 Apr 25       `* Re: poor man's decal4Liz Tuddenham
3 Apr 25        `* Re: poor man's decal3Don Y
3 Apr 25         `* Re: poor man's decal2Liz Tuddenham
3 Apr 25          `- Re: poor man's decal1Don Y
1 Apr 25 * can't do it9john larkin
1 Apr 25 +* Re: can't do it2Martin Rid
2 Apr 25 i`- Re: can't do it1john larkin
2 Apr 25 +- Re: can't do it1Phil Hobbs
2 Apr 25 +* Re: can't do it4Liz Tuddenham
2 Apr 25 i`* Re: can't do it3John R Walliker
2 Apr 25 i `* Re: can't do it2Cursitor Doom
2 Apr 25 i  `- Re: can't do it1Phil Hobbs
2 Apr 25 `- Re: can't do it1Lasse Langwadt
30 Mar 25 * OT: Ukraine17Cursitor Doom
31 Mar 25 +* Re: OT: Ukraine10Bill Sloman
31 Mar 25 i`* Re: OT: Ukraine9Gerhard Hoffmann
31 Mar 25 i `* Re: OT: Ukraine8john larkin
31 Mar 25 i  +- Re: OT: Ukraine1Bill Sloman
31 Mar 25 i  +* Re: OT: Ukraine3Jeroen Belleman
31 Mar 25 i  i`* Re: OT: Ukraine2john larkin
1 Apr 25 i  i `- Re: OT: Ukraine1Bill Sloman
1 Apr 25 i  `* Re: OT: Ukraine3KevinJ93
1 Apr 25 i   `* Re: OT: Ukraine2john larkin
2 Apr 25 i    `- Re: OT: Ukraine1Bill Sloman
31 Mar 25 `* Re: OT: Ukraine6Bill Sloman
31 Mar 25  `* Re: OT: Ukraine5Gerhard Hoffmann
31 Mar 25   `* Re: OT: Ukraine4Liz Tuddenham
31 Mar 25    +* Re: OT: Ukraine2Don Y
1 Apr 25    i`- Re: OT: Ukraine1Bill Sloman
31 Mar 25    `- Re: OT: Ukraine1Jeroen Belleman
18 Mar 25 * 50 ohm termination25Toaster
18 Mar 25 +* Re: 50 ohm termination23john larkin
18 Mar 25 i`* Re: 50 ohm termination22Toaster
18 Mar 25 i +- Re: 50 ohm termination1Bill Sloman
18 Mar 25 i `* Re: 50 ohm termination20john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal