comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Aug 24 i         +- Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider1Richard Damon
10 Aug 24 i         `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider8Mikko
10 Aug 24 i          `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider7olcott
10 Aug 24 i           +* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider3Richard Damon
10 Aug 24 i           i`* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider2olcott
10 Aug 24 i           i `- Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider1Richard Damon
11 Aug 24 i           `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider3Mikko
11 Aug 24 i            `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider2olcott
11 Aug 24 i             `- Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider1Richard Damon
5 Aug 24 `* Re: Defining a correct halt decider21Mikko
5 Aug 24  `* I call it a halting decidability decider20olcott
5 Aug 24   +* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider14Python
5 Aug 24   i`* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider13olcott
6 Aug 24   i +* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider.5Richard Damon
6 Aug 24   i i`* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider.4olcott
6 Aug 24   i i `* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider.3Richard Damon
6 Aug 24   i i  `* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider.2olcott
6 Aug 24   i i   `- Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider.1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24   i `* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider7Mikko
7 Aug 24   i  `* HHH decides a non-trivial semantic property of its input6olcott
8 Aug 24   i   +- Re: HHH decides a trivial semantic non-property of its input1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24   i   +* Re: HHH decides a non-trivial semantic property of its input3Mikko
8 Aug 24   i   i`* Re: HHH decides a non-trivial semantic property of its input2olcott
9 Aug 24   i   i `- Re: HHH decides a non-trivial semantic property of its input1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24   i   `- Re: HHH decides a trivial non-semantic non-property of its input1Richard Damon
6 Aug 24   +- Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus doesn't say anything about the halting problem1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24   `* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider4Mikko
7 Aug 24    `* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider3olcott
8 Aug 24     +- Re: I call it a halting decidability decider1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24     `- Re: I call it a halting decidability decider1Mikko
5 Aug 24 * Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language?8olcott
6 Aug 24 +- Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language? Peter Olcott sure is,1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 `* Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language?6Mikko
7 Aug 24  `* Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language?5olcott
8 Aug 24   +- Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language?1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24   `* Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language?3Mikko
8 Aug 24    `* HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state2olcott
9 Aug 24     `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state1Richard Damon
6 Aug 24 * Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point26olcott
6 Aug 24 +* Re: behaviour and description18joes
6 Aug 24 i`* Re: behaviour and description17olcott
7 Aug 24 i `* Re: behaviour and description16Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i  `* Re: behaviour and description --- Trust Mike?15olcott
7 Aug 24 i   `* Re: behaviour and description --- Lying Peter14Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i    +* Re: behaviour and description --- Lying Peter2olcott
7 Aug 24 i    i`- Re: behaviour and description --- Lying Peter1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i    +* Re: behavior and description --- All Rebuttals have been pure bluster2olcott
7 Aug 24 i    i`- Re: behavior and description --- Peter Olcott's Rebuttals have been pure bluster1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i    `* Re: behavior and description --- All rebuttals have been pure bluster V39olcott
7 Aug 24 i     `* Re: behavior and description --- Peter Olcott's rebuttals have been pure bluster V38Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i      `* Re: behavior and description --- Rebuttals have been pure bluster V37olcott
7 Aug 24 i       `* Re: behavior and description --- Peter Olcott's Rebuttals have been pure bluster V36Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i        `* Re: behavior and description --- Richard still only has pure bluster5olcott
7 Aug 24 i         +* Re: behavior and description --- Peter still only has pure bluster and lies3Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i         i`* Re: behavior and description --- All of the code is here it is just hard to find2olcott
8 Aug 24 i         i `- Re: behavior and description --- All of the code is here it is just hard to find (No its not, no HHH given)1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24 i         `- Re: behavior and description --- Richard still only has pure bluster1Mikko
7 Aug 24 +- Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point FAILED.1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 +* Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point3Mikko
7 Aug 24 i`* Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point2olcott
8 Aug 24 i `- Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point1Mikko
7 Aug 24 `* Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point3Fred. Zwarts
7 Aug 24  `* Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point2olcott
8 Aug 24   `- Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point1Fred. Zwarts
2 Aug 24 * Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this37olcott
2 Aug 24 +* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this ---7olcott
2 Aug 24 i`* Re: Peter Olcott here seems to consistently lie about this ---6Richard Damon
2 Aug 24 i `* Re: Peter Olcott here seems to consistently lie about this ---5olcott
2 Aug 24 i  `* Re: Peter Olcott here seems to consistently lie about this ---4Richard Damon
2 Aug 24 i   `* Re: Peter Olcott here seems to consistently lie about this ---3olcott
2 Aug 24 i    `* Re: Peter Olcott seems to consistently lie about this ---2Richard Damon
3 Aug 24 i     `- Re: Peter Olcott seems to consistently lie about this ---1Mikko
2 Aug 24 +- Re: Peter Olcott here seems to consistently lie about this1Richard Damon
2 Aug 24 +* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this3Fred. Zwarts
2 Aug 24 i`* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this2olcott
2 Aug 24 i `- Re: Peter Olcott seems to consistently lie about this1Richard Damon
3 Aug 24 `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this25Mikko
3 Aug 24  `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this24olcott
3 Aug 24   +* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this9Fred. Zwarts
3 Aug 24   i`* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this8olcott
3 Aug 24   i `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this7Fred. Zwarts
3 Aug 24   i  `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this6olcott
4 Aug 24   i   `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this5Fred. Zwarts
4 Aug 24   i    `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this4olcott
4 Aug 24   i     +- Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this1Richard Damon
5 Aug 24   i     `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this2Mikko
5 Aug 24   i      `- Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this1olcott
4 Aug 24   `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this14Mikko
4 Aug 24    `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this13olcott
4 Aug 24     +- Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this1Richard Damon
5 Aug 24     `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this11Mikko
5 Aug 24      `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this10olcott
6 Aug 24       `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this9Mikko
6 Aug 24        `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this8olcott
6 Aug 24         +- Re: Peter Olcott seems to consistently lie about this1Richard Damon
6 Aug 24         +* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this3Richard Damon
6 Aug 24         i`* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this2olcott
7 Aug 24         i `- Re: Petyer Olcott seems to consistently lie about this1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24         `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this3Mikko
7 Aug 24          `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this2olcott
8 Aug 24           `- Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this1Mikko
20 Jul 24 * Hypothetical possibilities221olcott
20 Jul 24 +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
20 Jul 24 i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities101Fred. Zwarts
20 Jul 24 i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities100olcott
20 Jul 24 i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities47Fred. Zwarts
20 Jul 24 i i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities6olcott
20 Jul 24 i ii+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities4Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i iii`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3olcott
20 Jul 24 i iii +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i iii `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i ii`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Fred. Zwarts
20 Jul 24 i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities40Alan Mackenzie
20 Jul 24 i i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities11olcott
20 Jul 24 i i i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2Alan Mackenzie
22 Jul 24 i i ii`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Alan Mackenzie tries to get away with mere rhetoric as a rebuttal1olcott
21 Jul 24 i i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities8Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i i i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities7olcott
21 Jul 24 i i i  +* Re: Recursive simulation (was: Hypothetical possibilities)3joes
21 Jul 24 i i i  i`* Re: Recursive simulation2olcott
21 Jul 24 i i i  i `- Re: Recursive simulation1Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i i i  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i i i  i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1joes
21 Jul 24 i i i  `- Re: Hypothetical IMpossibilities1Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
21 Jul 24 i i i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i i +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Alan Mackenzie1olcott
20 Jul 24 i i +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Alan Mackenzie1olcott
21 Jul 24 i i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities7olcott
21 Jul 24 i i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities6Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i i i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities5olcott
21 Jul 24 i i i  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3Fred. Zwarts
22 Jul 24 i i i  i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
22 Jul 24 i i i  i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i i i  `- Re: Hypothetical IMpossibilities1Richard Damon
22 Jul 24 i i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric16olcott
22 Jul 24 i i i+- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric1Fred. Zwarts
22 Jul 24 i i i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric4Alan Mackenzie
22 Jul 24 i i ii+- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric --- Liar?1olcott
22 Jul 24 i i ii`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away denying tautologies2olcott
23 Jul 24 i i ii `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away denying tautologies1Fred. Zwarts
23 Jul 24 i i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric10Mikko
23 Jul 24 i i i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric9olcott
23 Jul 24 i i i  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric7Alan Mackenzie
23 Jul 24 i i i  i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric --- Dishonest reviews that ignore what I say6olcott
23 Jul 24 i i i  i +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric --- Dishonest reviews that ignore what I say1Fred. Zwarts
24 Jul 24 i i i  i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric --- Dishonest reviews that ignore what I say4Richard Damon
24 Jul 24 i i i  i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Mindless robots programmed to disagree3olcott
24 Jul 24 i i i  i   +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Olcott is a Mindless robots programmed to disagree1Richard Damon
24 Jul 24 i i i  i   `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Mindless robots programmed to disagree1Fred. Zwarts
25 Jul 24 i i i  `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric1Mikko
22 Jul 24 i i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Alan Mackenzie tries to get away with mere rhetoric as a rebuttal1olcott
20 Jul 24 i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities52Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities51olcott
20 Jul 24 i   +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities49joes
20 Jul 24 i   i+- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i   i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities47olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities46Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities45olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities44Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i    `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities43olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i     `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities42Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i      `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities41olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i       `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities40Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities31olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities30Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities6olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities5Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities4olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i i   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i i    `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully23olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully6olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  i+- Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully1Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully4joes
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully3olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully2joes
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  i   `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully1olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully16Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully14olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully13Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully8olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully7joes
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully6olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully4joes
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i  i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully3olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i  i +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully1Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i  i `- Re: Hypothetical IMpossibilities -- I reread this again more carefully1Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i  `- Re: Hypothetical IMpossibilities -- I reread this again more carefully1Richard Damon
22 Jul 24 i   i        i   i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully4olcott
22 Jul 24 i   i        i   i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully3Richard Damon
22 Jul 24 i   i        i   i   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully2olcott
23 Jul 24 i   i        i   i    `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully1Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully --- correction1olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities8olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i         `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities7Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i          `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities6olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i           `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities5Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i            `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities4olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i             `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i              `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i               `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i   `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
22 Jul 24 `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities116Mikko
22 Jul 24  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities115olcott
23 Jul 24   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities114Mikko
23 Jul 24    `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities113olcott
24 Jul 24     `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities112Mikko
24 Jul 24      `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities111olcott
26 Jul 24       `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities110Mikko
26 Jul 24        `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities109olcott
27 Jul 24         `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities108Mikko
27 Jul 24          +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal96olcott
27 Jul 24          i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal88Alan Mackenzie
27 Jul 24          ii`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal87olcott
27 Jul 24          ii +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal3Alan Mackenzie
27 Jul 24          ii i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- strawman deception based rebuttal2olcott
28 Jul 24          ii i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- strawman deception based rebuttal1Mikko
28 Jul 24          ii `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal83Mikko
29 Jul 24          ii  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal4olcott
29 Jul 24          ii  i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal2joes
29 Jul 24          ii  ii`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal1olcott
30 Jul 24          ii  i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal1Mikko
30 Jul 24          ii  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal78olcott
31 Jul 24          ii   +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal74Richard Damon
31 Jul 24          ii   i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal ---2olcott
31 Jul 24          ii   ii`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal by olcott---1Richard Damon
31 Jul 24          ii   i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal ---71olcott
31 Jul 24          ii   i +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid lying rebuttal by Olcott ---1Richard Damon
31 Jul 24          ii   i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal by Olcott---69Richard Damon
31 Jul 24          ii   i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal ---68olcott
31 Jul 24          ii   i   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal ---67Fred. Zwarts
31 Jul 24          ii   i    `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years66olcott
31 Jul 24          ii   i     `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years65Fred. Zwarts
31 Jul 24          ii   i      `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years64olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i       +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years8joes
1 Aug 24          ii   i       i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years7olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i       i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years6Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24          ii   i       i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years5olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i       i   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years4Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24          ii   i       i    `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years3olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i       i     +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years1Fred. Zwarts
2 Aug 24          ii   i       i     `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- INCorrect emulation has been proven for three years1Richard Damon
1 Aug 24          ii   i       `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years55Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24          ii   i        `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof54olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i         `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof53Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24          ii   i          `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof52olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal